here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1725 Student Visas<br />
6 JUNE 2013<br />
Student Visas<br />
1726<br />
[Nicola Blackwood]<br />
been about the frequent changes to student visas, which<br />
are much more of a difficulty for both students and the<br />
university. Perhaps he might like to comment on those<br />
issues, as they are the main challenges that are actually<br />
faced by the university’s students.<br />
Mr Smith: I will take those comments as warm and<br />
strong support for the points I have made about the<br />
damage the changes to the visa regime have done.<br />
The Government are denying independent colleges a<br />
level playing field and disadvantaging them in a number<br />
of respects. These include: the 2011 two-year cap on<br />
international student numbers; all the uncertainties of<br />
the twice-yearly Highly Trusted Sponsor renewal<br />
application; the denial of part-time work for students<br />
either in term time or holidays; student exclusion from<br />
the new post-study work schemes for PhD and MBA<br />
graduates; and the fact that unlike university students,<br />
PhD students at independent colleges are not exempt<br />
from Tier 4’s five-year time limit, so they cannot do a<br />
first degree in the UK before their PhD.<br />
It is little surprising that international student enrolments<br />
on higher education courses at independent colleges fell<br />
by over 70% between 2011 and 2012, with a fall of 46%<br />
in college sector visas for the year ending March 2013.<br />
This has destroyed tens—possibly hundreds—of college<br />
businesses, cost thousands of jobs and resulted in a loss<br />
of income to the families accommodating students and<br />
to the local businesses and communities within which<br />
they spend their money.<br />
I strongly support the motion. I hope that the<br />
Government will listen to the Select Committees that<br />
have come to the same view and take international<br />
students out of the migrations statistics used to steer<br />
UK immigration policy. I hope that Ministers will remove<br />
the unfair penalties imposed on independent colleges,<br />
work in partnership with them to develop longer-term,<br />
highly trusted accreditation and promote the contribution<br />
these colleges make. I also urge them more generally to<br />
think further and positively about how to encourage,<br />
not discourage, overseas students at all levels who want<br />
to come <strong>here</strong>, as those students invigorate universities<br />
and other education institutions and generate lots of<br />
overseas earnings, jobs and economic demand, which<br />
people <strong>here</strong> desperately need. Doing so would rebuild<br />
Britain’s reputation in the world as somew<strong>here</strong> that<br />
welcomes international students and researchers and<br />
recognises their enormous potential contribution to our<br />
culture and economy—which, let us remember, is to the<br />
benefit of us all.<br />
2.1 pm<br />
Damian Hinds (East Hampshire) (Con): In the media,<br />
international students at our universities are generally<br />
seen though one of two lenses: the positive one is that<br />
they are a cash-cow, premium product that historically<br />
has cross-subsidised domestic students in our universities;<br />
the negative one is that, because of this, they might end<br />
up getting too many places at our universities, thus<br />
keeping out some of our home-grown talent. Both are<br />
completely the wrong way of thinking about international<br />
students. This is a huge growth market in the world and<br />
vital to our economic growth.<br />
Education ought to be for us a focus sector, alongside<br />
life sciences, advanced manufacturing, the digital and<br />
creative industries, professional services and tourism. It<br />
is also a market in which, thankfully, we have strong<br />
competitive advantages. We have some of the best brand<br />
names in the business: Oxford, Cambridge, Edinburgh,<br />
St Andrews, Birmingham, Manchester, Queen’s Belfast,<br />
the London School of Economics—[HON. MEMBERS:<br />
“Hear, hear!”] I can name check others, if anyone wants<br />
me to.<br />
Julian Smith (Skipton and Ripon) (Con): Leeds.<br />
Damian Hinds: Thank you.<br />
All in all, about one fifth of the top 100 universities<br />
and about one fifth of the top 50 business schools in the<br />
world are ours, and of course we have that great asset,<br />
the English language.<br />
The sector has other advantages. The first and most<br />
obvious is export earnings and the jobs it supports in<br />
this country, but it is also important in the battle for<br />
talent, in bringing into the country the people we need<br />
to help our economy succeed. It also helps with what<br />
people have called soft power—or, as I would prefer to<br />
describe it, the promotion of Britain abroad and the<br />
fostering of business and cultural links throughout the<br />
world.<br />
The sector has several secondary advantages. For<br />
one, unusually among the key growth sectors, its<br />
employment and economic growth prospects are well<br />
distributed throughout the UK, not concentrated in<br />
one place, such as London. Secondly, university rankings<br />
depend on having a certain proportion of foreign students<br />
at a university, because international rankings consider<br />
that if a university is not good enough to attract foreign<br />
students, it is probably not very good. Thirdly, having a<br />
vibrant, cosmopolitan HE sector helps to reinforce<br />
several other growth strategy objectives, particularly to<br />
bring forward research and development in key sectors<br />
and to make this country the headquarters location of<br />
choice for multinationals.<br />
As many hon. Members have said, this is a growing<br />
world market. In 1980, about 1 million students were<br />
enrolled in institutions outside their country of origin,<br />
but by 2010 that figure was 3.3 million. We know that<br />
more recently the compound annual growth rate trend—<br />
obviously it has moved a bit in the last couple of<br />
years—has been about 7%, which is a strong growth<br />
rate for an attractive industry. According to the McKinsey<br />
report on the seven long-term priorities for the UK, if<br />
we can hold our share—grow it as the market grows—and<br />
harvest just half of the benefit, it would be worth an<br />
additional 80,000 jobs in the country by 2030.<br />
Roberta Blackman-Woods: Does the hon. Gentleman<br />
agree that holding that share is becoming more difficult,<br />
because of the challenge from countries such as Australia<br />
and Canada, and that the Government should be<br />
strengthening our universities’ ability to attract overseas<br />
students, not making it more difficult, as they are doing<br />
at present?<br />
Damian Hinds: The hon. Lady brilliantly anticipates<br />
my next point. Of course, she is absolutely correct. As<br />
my hon. Friend the Member for Croydon Central (Gavin<br />
Barwell) said, we are, to coin a phrase, in a global race,