here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
here - United Kingdom Parliament
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
293WH<br />
Drugs<br />
6 JUNE 2013<br />
Drugs<br />
294WH<br />
just ban street names or individual drugs; we ban groupings<br />
of drugs to try to stop people breaking the spirit of the<br />
law but staying within the letter of the law. The problem,<br />
however, is constantly mutating and we want to maintain<br />
the academic rigour that enables the ACMD to consider<br />
such matters at length while also having the speed to<br />
deal with evolving threats more quickly than it otherwise<br />
could. That is why we have the temporary orders lasting<br />
12 months and a more considered process following on<br />
from that. I do not pretend that this is an area in which<br />
any country does not have public policy challenges to<br />
consider. How such drugs are couriered and supplied is<br />
also a potential new cause for concern, because people<br />
order them on the internet and the drug smuggling does<br />
not take the familiar, conventional form.<br />
This is a big area of public policy and t<strong>here</strong> are some<br />
causes for cautious optimism. Some drug consumption<br />
trends in this country are positive. If they were going in<br />
the opposite direction, I suggest that t<strong>here</strong> would be far<br />
more Members at this debate and a bigger clamour to<br />
ask the Government what they were doing about increases<br />
in heroin or crack cocaine consumption. We should<br />
momentarily reflect on the good news and progress,<br />
w<strong>here</strong> it is being made.<br />
However, this is an area of public policy that never<br />
stops evolving, and many new drugs are becoming<br />
available. The patterns of drug consumption are evolving.<br />
It is subject to fashion and trends, and we must be alive<br />
to the harms, educate people about them, try to persuade<br />
people not to take drugs, look at w<strong>here</strong> we can restrict<br />
supply to benefit public health and help people to<br />
recover. All of those are part of our strategy. I welcome<br />
the contributions of hon. and right hon. Members and<br />
I remind open-minded as to how to ensure that we can<br />
work as intelligently as possible to reduce the harm to<br />
the British public.<br />
Mr Clive Betts (in the Chair): I call the Chair of the<br />
Select Committee on Home Affairs briefly to wind up.<br />
3.26 pm<br />
Keith Vaz: I welcome you to the Chair, Mr Betts, even<br />
though the sign in front of you, which has not been<br />
changed, still describes you as the hon. Member for<br />
York Central (Hugh Bayley), so we shall perhaps evermore<br />
call you by the previous Chair’s name.<br />
The debate has been excellent and I thank the Minister,<br />
the shadow Minister, who is suffering greatly with her<br />
throat infection, and the hon. Member for Cambridge<br />
(Dr Huppert) for taking part. As the shadow Minister<br />
said, it is not about the numbers present, it is about the<br />
quality of the contributions, and the Minister’s approach<br />
has been extremely measured and positive.<br />
The Select Committee on Home Affairs will look<br />
again at the subject in six months, but we promise to do<br />
so every 12 months when we publish a report. At the<br />
moment, the Government have adopted five of the 10<br />
recommendations—50%. We encourage the Minister’s<br />
trips around the world. We do not usually like to see<br />
Ministers, in particular those from the Home Office, go<br />
abroad, but we understand the need to travel. Actually,<br />
I think it would be a good idea for him to take the<br />
shadow Minister with him in this era of cross-party<br />
co-operation on drugs, because t<strong>here</strong> is much cross-party<br />
agreement on what we should do. Perhaps she should<br />
go with him after she has had treatment for her throat,<br />
and we could get a cross-<strong>Parliament</strong> approach.<br />
We will continue to monitor the matter, and I am<br />
grateful to the Minister for his indications. He has<br />
shown that he is prepared to listen to the shadow<br />
Minister, which is extremely important, but also to the<br />
hon. Member for Cambridge, who originally suggested<br />
this inquiry to the Home Affairs Committee. He has<br />
done the most work and has been as assiduous as<br />
always, passing between Bill Committees and sittings of<br />
the Home Affairs Committee, and the report will be<br />
important to reflect on in future.<br />
Question put and agreed to.<br />
3.28 pm<br />
Sitting adjourned.