26.06.2012 Views

2005-2006 Financial Statements and Management Report

2005-2006 Financial Statements and Management Report

2005-2006 Financial Statements and Management Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ThyssenKrupp Dienstleistungen GmbH received an appropriate<br />

compensation for this, which will be adjusted in the event of major<br />

changes to the main assumptions underlying the calculation. A<br />

corresponding adjustment was made in the year under review.<br />

13 OTHER FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS<br />

AND OTHER RISKS<br />

Obligations from rental <strong>and</strong> lease agreements are due in the coming<br />

fiscal years as follows:<br />

million €<br />

<strong>2006</strong>/2007<br />

2007/2008<br />

2008/2009<br />

11.9<br />

9.3<br />

4.9<br />

A liability obligation in the amount of €2.8 million (previous year<br />

€2.8 million) exists vis-à-vis Technische Gase Hoesch Messer<br />

Griesheim GmbH & Co. KG.<br />

On October 11, <strong>2005</strong>, the European Commission announced<br />

the initiation of administrative fine proceedings against companies<br />

in the elevator <strong>and</strong> escalator industry. This has also affected some<br />

European companies of the ThyssenKrupp Group. Prior to the<br />

initiation of the administrative fine proceedings, the European<br />

Commission had conducted pre-investigations at the beginning<br />

of 2004. As part of these pre-investigations, several revisions<br />

were carried out at the four major elevator manufacturers in the<br />

European Union <strong>and</strong> at the corresponding associations. Subject<br />

of the administrative fine proceedings is the allegation that the<br />

respective companies are accused of having violated the European<br />

antitrust law in connection with the manufacturing <strong>and</strong> servicing<br />

million €<br />

Foreign currency forward contracts<br />

Currency options<br />

Foreign currency derivatives<br />

Cross-currency swaps<br />

Interest-rate swaps<br />

Interest rate derivatives<br />

Commodity forward transactions<br />

Commodity derivatives<br />

Total<br />

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND MANAGEMENT REPORT Notes 81<br />

of elevators <strong>and</strong> escalators as well as the selling of the respective<br />

spare parts in certain member states of the European Union.<br />

ThyssenKrupp is cooperating with the antitrust authorities. The<br />

eu Commission has not yet declared the amount of any possible<br />

administrative fine <strong>and</strong> therefore ThyssenKrupp is not yet able to<br />

estimate the financial consequences of the administrative fine<br />

proceedings.<br />

On January 26, <strong>2006</strong> ThyssenKrupp ag signed an agreement<br />

with Mittal Steel Company n.v. under which ThyssenKrupp<br />

undertakes to purchase up to 100% of the shares in Dofasco<br />

in the event that Mittal acquires Arcelor. This can lead to an<br />

obligation of up to €4.0 billion.<br />

14 DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS<br />

In connection with the management of currency, interest-rate <strong>and</strong><br />

commodity price risks, ThyssenKrupp ag uses derivative financial<br />

instruments. The values of these derivative financial instruments<br />

are as follows:<br />

Derivative financial instruments <strong>and</strong> the corresponding underlying<br />

transactions can be treated as a single valuation unit if evidence<br />

of a clear hedge relationship can be provided. In these cases the<br />

underlying transactions are recognized at the contractually agreed<br />

hedge rates <strong>and</strong> the derivative financial instruments are not reported<br />

separately.<br />

ThyssenKrupp ag only uses derivative financial instruments<br />

matched directly to hedged transactions. ThyssenKrupp ag<br />

therefore has no reportable risks, because any negative fair<br />

values applicable to derivative financial instruments are set<br />

against positive developments in the associated underlying<br />

transactions.<br />

The following methods are used to determine the fair value:<br />

Nominal value<br />

Sep. 30, <strong>2005</strong><br />

953.1<br />

—<br />

953.1<br />

750.0<br />

35.8<br />

785.8<br />

—<br />

—<br />

1,738.9<br />

Fair value<br />

1.1<br />

—<br />

1.1<br />

(72.2)<br />

(2.5)<br />

(74.7)<br />

—<br />

—<br />

(73.6)<br />

Nominal value<br />

Sep. 30, <strong>2006</strong><br />

193.8<br />

28.0<br />

221.8<br />

750.0<br />

35.8<br />

785.8<br />

22.4<br />

22.4<br />

1,030.0<br />

Fair value<br />

(8.4)<br />

(0.8)<br />

(9.2)<br />

(48.3)<br />

(1.1)<br />

(49.4)<br />

1.4<br />

1.4<br />

(57.2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!