13.06.2014 Views

Download Complete Report (PDF 1.19mb) - RNIB

Download Complete Report (PDF 1.19mb) - RNIB

Download Complete Report (PDF 1.19mb) - RNIB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Setting the scene<br />

could be overcome. Confidence with technology and awareness of assistive devices and<br />

technologies are important in increasing independence. A few participants felt entirely<br />

excluded from particular activities and did not consider that technology could offer<br />

assistance to them. For many of these people, confidence with technology or having<br />

the know-how (eg word-of-mouth through close social networks of people with similar<br />

sight problems) was lacking.<br />

Participants’ views on how industry can and could support their needs varied, often<br />

related to their sense of dependency. For instance, for some partially sighted<br />

participants, technical solutions involving colours and contrast were key; whilst some of<br />

those who were blind expected that they would require more substantial product<br />

modifications.<br />

Some participants were sympathetic to the hurdles faced by industry in implementing<br />

accessible and usable product design, commonly citing small markets as a possible<br />

hurdle for industry. Others felt they were increasingly being left behind in a world<br />

dominated by new digital technologies in which their existing learned product-use<br />

strategies are no longer effective or relevant (eg touch-screen devices).<br />

“I think in an ideal world, companies should build things designed for blind people<br />

but I know the audience is limited. For me [it] is difficult to find and buy<br />

something suitable because I am not totally blind; I need devices with extra<br />

features rather than talking substitutes. Things like changeable colours are really<br />

useful for me.” [blind and partially sighted: mild sight loss, male, 18-30 years]<br />

“It is important to have disabled people [involved] in the products design process.”<br />

[blind and partially sighted: severe sight loss, male, 75+ years]<br />

5.3. Value of radio (all samples)<br />

Radio valued by all samples<br />

Radio was valued by all participants who were interviewed irrespective of the sample<br />

from which they were drawn. This may partly reflect a sampling bias - all were recruited<br />

because they were DAB radio users and willing to give time to talk about their DAB<br />

radio experiences. Similar sampling bias could be present in any similar type of<br />

research, where participants voluntarily agree to take part. Across the participants who<br />

were sighted, there was no evidence to suggest any difference in the value placed on<br />

DAB radio between people with dyslexia, those with dexterity impairment and the<br />

sighted controls. The only differences related to the amount of time people had to<br />

listen to DAB radio - for instance older people who were retired (eg dexterity sample)<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!