Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

clerk’s division Marcia J. Mengel, clerk of court Office of the Clerk Marcia J. Mengel, clerk of court Office of Bar Admissions Marcia J. Mengel, director
In 2006 The Clerk’s Division consisted of the Office of the Clerk and the Office of Bar Admissions. The Office of the Clerk, the lead office of the division, is charged with supervising the filing of all case-related items and maintaining all case files in matters pending before the Court. The Office of Bar Admissions assists the Supreme Court in exercising its Ohio constitutional responsibility to regulate the admission of applicants to the practice of law. The clerk of the Court provides oversight and administrative direction for the division. Office of the Clerk The Office of the Clerk manages all cases filed with the Supreme Court; maintains case dockets, the Court’s journal, and, in pending cases, trial and district appellate court records; prepares and issues Court orders; schedules oral arguments and the Court’s consideration of other case matters; coordinates interagency communication in death penalty cases; and manages the Court’s enforcement of continuing legal education requirements. The office is responsible for maintaining and enforcing the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio and recommending appropriate rule amendments to the Court. Deputy clerks and staff attorneys provide assistance on procedural issues to attorneys, litigants and the public through written communications, seminar presentations, and phone and office consultations; and by publishing answers to frequently asked questions and posting helpful information on the Web site. In 2006, the Office of the Clerk processed 2,407 new cases, about a 1.5 percent drop in new case filings from 2005. The office also handled the final disposition of 2,592 cases, a 22 percent increase in case dispositions over 2005. During the year, the Office of the Clerk worked with the Office of Information Technology to develop a case activity notification service. With this service, attorneys, litigants, and members of the public can subscribe to automated notices issued whenever documents are filed in Supreme Court cases of interest. The subscriber may choose to receive notices of new case activity either by e-mail or by RSS (really simple syndication) alerts. The The Supreme Court electronic case activity notification service became available in 2006. 25
Page 1 and 2: The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual Re
Page 3: The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual 20
Page 7 and 8: table of contents 2006 2 Justices o
Page 9 and 10: Justice Alice Robie Resnick is the
Page 11 and 12: With his re-election to the Supreme
Page 13 and 14: 2006A look back January A collectio
Page 15 and 16: Oct. 20 Fifteen Ohio judges are sel
Page 17 and 18: Justice Brown (back row, far left)
Page 19 and 20: Justice Resnick with Chief Justice
Page 21 and 22: need to repeatedly visit a Web site
Page 23 and 24: supreme court administrative struct
Page 25 and 26: The Administrative Division is the
Page 27 and 28: The Office of Court Security provid
Page 29: Visitor Education Center The Visito
Page 33 and 34: educed handwriting fatigue and enha
Page 35 and 36: The Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Case
Page 43 and 44: The Legal Resources Division consis
Page 45 and 46: Law Library Updates Information Ser
Page 47 and 48: The Fiscal & Management Resources D
Page 49 and 50: The Employee Events Committee is an
Page 51 and 52: Judiciary/Supreme Court 2006 expend
Page 53 and 54: The Information Technology Division
Page 55 and 56: Advisory Committee on Technology &
Page 57 and 58: the ohio courts network “All cour
Page 59 and 60: The Facilities Management Division
Page 61 and 62: Meetings & Events The Meetings & Ev
Page 63 and 64: The Office of Court Security organi
Page 65 and 66: The Attorney Services Division is r
Page 67 and 68: Attorney Registration & CLE Section
Page 69 and 70: The Judicial & Court Services Divis
Page 71 and 72: Judicial College The Judicial Colle
Page 73 and 74: Department of Job & Family Services
Page 75 and 76: The Specialized Dockets Section als
Page 77 and 78: Hon. Scott Gwin 5 th District Court
Page 79 and 80: Hon. Richard Rogers 3 rd District C
Page 81 and 82:
The supreme Court has the constitut
Page 83 and 84:
Five present and former board membe
Page 85 and 86:
Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission
Page 87 and 88:
The following is a chronological li
Page 89 and 90:
is entitled to exemption of its inv
Page 91 and 92:
exception to the state Public Recor
Page 93 and 94:
Judgment reversed. Moyer, C.J., O
Page 95 and 96:
Orders the Public Utilities Commiss
Page 97 and 98:
June Knox Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Kn
Page 99 and 100:
Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’
Page 101 and 102:
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lund
Page 103 and 104:
Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in p
Page 105 and 106:
October State ex rel. Ohio Democrat
Page 107 and 108:
November In re J.J. Case no. 2006-0
Page 109 and 110:
statements may not be compelled by
Page 111 and 112:
Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Res
Page 113 and 114:
Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’
Page 115:
Herb Hungerford, Custodian Herbert
Page 118:
The Supreme Court of Ohio 65 South
show all

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?