29.06.2014 Views

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor,<br />

O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ.,<br />

concur.<br />

<strong>State</strong> ex rel. Dann v. Taft<br />

Case no. 2005-1222<br />

Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-1825<br />

Rules the governor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> has a<br />

limited executive privilege allowing<br />

some communications between him<br />

and his policy advisors to be withheld<br />

from public disclosure when the<br />

communications are made for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> fostering informed and<br />

sound policymaking.<br />

In Mandamus.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />

O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />

Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.<br />

Fowee v. Wesley Hall Inc.<br />

Case no. 2005-0272<br />

Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-1712<br />

When an employer files a court<br />

action appealing the award <strong>of</strong><br />

workers’ compensation benefits<br />

to one <strong>of</strong> its employees, and the<br />

employee voluntarily dismisses her<br />

petition for continuing benefits, the<br />

employee must refile the petition<br />

within one year or forfeit the right<br />

to dispute the appeal, as dictated in<br />

<strong>Ohio</strong>’s saving statute.<br />

Hamilton App. No. C-040188,<br />

2004-<strong>Ohio</strong>-7002. Judgment<br />

reversed.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg<br />

Stratton, O’Connor, and<br />

Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />

Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ.,<br />

concur in judgment only.<br />

<strong>State</strong> ex rel. Fisher v. Cleveland<br />

Case no. 2004-1726<br />

Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-1827<br />

Rules the practice <strong>of</strong> requiring municipal<br />

employees to disclose personal income<br />

tax returns as part <strong>of</strong> an informal<br />

request to verify the employee’s primary<br />

residence constitutes an invasion <strong>of</strong><br />

privacy and abuse <strong>of</strong> the city’s corporate<br />

powers; those employees previously<br />

required to disclose personal tax returns<br />

under the aforementioned practice may<br />

seek injunctive relief through a taxpayer<br />

action lawsuit.<br />

Cuyahoga App. No. 83945, 2004-<br />

<strong>Ohio</strong>-4345. Judgment affirmed.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer,<br />

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor,<br />

O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ.,<br />

concur.<br />

May<br />

Hedges v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.<br />

Case nos. 2005-0193 and 2005-0415<br />

Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-1926<br />

Holds that the H.B. 261 version <strong>of</strong> R.C.<br />

3937.18(A), in force from September<br />

1997 to September 2000, permitted<br />

<strong>Ohio</strong> auto insurance policies issued<br />

during that period to limit uninsured/<br />

underinsured motorist coverage to<br />

collisions in which an uninsured driver<br />

caused the bodily injury, sickness, disease<br />

or death <strong>of</strong> an insured person.<br />

Franklin App. No. 04AP-423, 2004-<br />

<strong>Ohio</strong>-6723. Judgment reversed.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />

O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />

Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.<br />

<strong>Ohio</strong> Consumers’ Counsel<br />

v. Pub. Util. Comm.<br />

Case nos. 2004-1993, 2005-0118 and<br />

2005-0766<br />

Web cite <strong>2006</strong>-<strong>Ohio</strong>-2110<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!