29.06.2014 Views

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Advisory Committee on Technology & the <strong>Court</strong>s<br />

Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee<br />

During <strong>2006</strong>, the Technology Services Section provided<br />

staff assistance to the Advisory Committee on Technology<br />

& the <strong>Court</strong>s, which adopted revised operating procedures<br />

in accordance with the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> policies on advisory<br />

committees, and approved a recommendation from the<br />

Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee on the<br />

connectivity aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Court</strong>s Network.<br />

Additionally, the advisory committee worked to produce<br />

natural-language guidebooks and other publications for court<br />

decision-makers on technology issues. In an effort to collect<br />

information on possible uses <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Court</strong>s Network<br />

by court personnel, the Infrastructure & Interoperability<br />

Subcommittee conducted feedback sessions throughout the<br />

state. About 200 people attended the 10 feedback sessions in<br />

February and March <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

The advisory committee accepted the <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Court</strong>s<br />

Network requirements drafted by the Infrastructure &<br />

Interoperability Subcommittee. Parts <strong>of</strong> the requirements<br />

were incorporated into the request for proposals for the<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-concept phase <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>Court</strong>s Network.<br />

Finally, the Infrastructure & Interoperability<br />

Subcommittee, having fulfilled its mission and goals, was<br />

deactivated by the advisory committee.<br />

Advisory<br />

Committee on<br />

Technology & the<br />

<strong>Court</strong>s<br />

Mary Beth Parisi,<br />

staff liaison<br />

Hon. John P. Bessey, chair<br />

Sarah Brown-Clark<br />

Hon. James Cissell<br />

Tim Collins<br />

Joyce Craddock<br />

Hon. Dan Favreau<br />

Michael Flanagan<br />

Hon. Barbara Gorman<br />

Hon. Cheryl Grant<br />

Gerald Heaton<br />

Chief Brad Kunze<br />

Tom McDermott<br />

Milt Nuzum<br />

Gregory Popovich<br />

Hon. Jack Puffenberger<br />

Greg Scott<br />

Walter Wheeler<br />

Hon. John Wise<br />

Hon. Thomas Zachman<br />

Standards Subcommittee<br />

The Standards Subcommittee <strong>of</strong> the advisory committee<br />

completed a 90-day comment period in <strong>2006</strong> on proposed<br />

Electronic Filing Standards and accepted a revised draft.<br />

The completed standards and related documentation are<br />

expected to be presented to the advisory committee in early<br />

2007.<br />

The Standards Subcommittee also provisionally approved<br />

two electronic filing pilot projects in the Lake County Juvenile<br />

<strong>Court</strong> and the Montgomery County Common Pleas <strong>Court</strong>;<br />

reviewed and <strong>of</strong>fered feedback on the uniform electronic<br />

citation numbering proposal presented by the <strong>Ohio</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

Highway Patrol; and assisted the Advisory Committee on<br />

<strong>Court</strong> Security & Emergency Preparedness in creating a plan<br />

for dealing with an avian flu pandemic.<br />

In addition, the Standards Subcommittee reviewed<br />

facsimile filing rules submitted by courts throughout the state<br />

to ensure compliance with the Facsimile Filing Standards, and<br />

began discussing procedures for ensuring compliance with<br />

the Civil, Criminal, and Traffic Functional Case Management<br />

System Standards.<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!