Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

50 The subcommittee also began reviewing the 130 comments received during the comment period on the proposed Traffic Functional Case Management System Standards. The subcommittee continues its work with regard to creating courtroom records. In addition, it began researching the use of electronic signatures in other courts and industries, and is developing a checklist for evaluating local electronic signature rules submitted for provisional approval. The Standards Subcommittee researched the issue of retaining electronic communications at the request of the advisory committee and presented findings for future discussion within the full committee. The subject of document imaging was selected for the subcommittee’s first publication, which is under development.
the ohio courts network “All court clerks in Ohio now have computerized case management systems, and for many judges, the modem has replaced the telephone as their most frequent form of communication. From the initiation of a case until its conclusion, no aspect of the justice system has been unaffected by technology. We are now ready to take the next step … creating a digital connection between all courts through the Ohio Courts Network. Development of the network took an important step forward this week as the Supreme Court formally asked technology vendors to submit detailed proposals to build the system ... Once fully operational, courts will be able to share information with each other and with other partners in the justice system. Imagine a juvenile judge in Brown County who is hearing the case of a juvenile who appeared in the juvenile court in Lucas County. Access to those records will enable the Brown County judge to craft an appropriate rehabilitation program. In instances of domestic violence, the Ohio Courts Network will provide quicker and wider distribution of protection orders. Timely access to reliable information could make the difference between physical harm and safety. The network will feature a data warehouse for the collection of case information. A Web portal will allow all Ohio courts to access that information. The public will be able to access much of this information from a single Web site. The system is designed to minimize the investment required in new information technologies and reduce the trial and error of developing new systems in each county. All of this will be accomplished while maintaining local control over data and information. There may be other plans by other state agencies that want to bring data processing systems to the courts … but I assure you that our clear purpose is to develop a system for the courts, operated by the courts. The Ohio Courts Network will be the connection to these other state systems.” — Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer State of the Judiciary Sept. 14, 2006 51
Page 1 and 2:
The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual Re
Page 3:
The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual 20
Page 7 and 8: table of contents 2006 2 Justices o
Page 9 and 10: Justice Alice Robie Resnick is the
Page 11 and 12: With his re-election to the Supreme
Page 13 and 14: 2006A look back January A collectio
Page 15 and 16: Oct. 20 Fifteen Ohio judges are sel
Page 17 and 18: Justice Brown (back row, far left)
Page 19 and 20: Justice Resnick with Chief Justice
Page 21 and 22: need to repeatedly visit a Web site
Page 23 and 24: supreme court administrative struct
Page 25 and 26: The Administrative Division is the
Page 27 and 28: The Office of Court Security provid
Page 29 and 30: Visitor Education Center The Visito
Page 31 and 32: In 2006 The Clerk’s Division cons
Page 33 and 34: educed handwriting fatigue and enha
Page 35 and 36: The Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Case
Page 43 and 44: The Legal Resources Division consis
Page 45 and 46: Law Library Updates Information Ser
Page 47 and 48: The Fiscal & Management Resources D
Page 49 and 50: The Employee Events Committee is an
Page 51 and 52: Judiciary/Supreme Court 2006 expend
Page 53 and 54: The Information Technology Division
Page 55: Advisory Committee on Technology &
Page 59 and 60: The Facilities Management Division
Page 61 and 62: Meetings & Events The Meetings & Ev
Page 63 and 64: The Office of Court Security organi
Page 65 and 66: The Attorney Services Division is r
Page 67 and 68: Attorney Registration & CLE Section
Page 69 and 70: The Judicial & Court Services Divis
Page 71 and 72: Judicial College The Judicial Colle
Page 73 and 74: Department of Job & Family Services
Page 75 and 76: The Specialized Dockets Section als
Page 77 and 78: Hon. Scott Gwin 5 th District Court
Page 79 and 80: Hon. Richard Rogers 3 rd District C
Page 81 and 82: The supreme Court has the constitut
Page 83 and 84: Five present and former board membe
Page 85 and 86: Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission
Page 87 and 88: The following is a chronological li
Page 89 and 90: is entitled to exemption of its inv
Page 91 and 92: exception to the state Public Recor
Page 93 and 94: Judgment reversed. Moyer, C.J., O
Page 95 and 96: Orders the Public Utilities Commiss
Page 97 and 98: June Knox Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Kn
Page 99 and 100: Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’
Page 101 and 102: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lund
Page 103 and 104: Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in p
Page 105 and 106: October State ex rel. Ohio Democrat
Page 107 and 108:
November In re J.J. Case no. 2006-0
Page 109 and 110:
statements may not be compelled by
Page 111 and 112:
Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Res
Page 113 and 114:
Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’
Page 115:
Herb Hungerford, Custodian Herbert
Page 118:
The Supreme Court of Ohio 65 South
show all

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?