Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

conference rooms. The division also installed a high-speed special-purpose data storage facility designed to manage and support diverse databases. This storage area network used by the Court will be available to the Ohio Courts Network system. Office of Information Technology The Office of Information Technology develops, implements and maintains the various information systems and applications used by the Court and its affiliated offices. Office of Network & Technology Resources The Office of Network & Technology Resources manages the Court’s computer network, network security, help desk, software training classes and software implementation, as well as copiers, technology-related purchases, audiovisual systems, teleconferencing systems and telecommunications (voice, data and video). Technology Services Section The Technology Services Section assists other courts in the state with technology-related decisions and projects, such as the use of case management systems and equipment purchases. In 2006, Technology Services staff completed 14 courtassistance projects, ranging from upgrading the case management system to assisting in developing multimedia courtrooms, and providing 13 project guidebooks to courts to assist in managing their technology projects. The new appellate case management system was successfully installed in the 6 th , 9 th and 12 th district courts of appeals. 48
Advisory Committee on Technology & the Courts Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee During 2006, the Technology Services Section provided staff assistance to the Advisory Committee on Technology & the Courts, which adopted revised operating procedures in accordance with the Supreme Court policies on advisory committees, and approved a recommendation from the Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee on the connectivity aspects of the Ohio Courts Network. Additionally, the advisory committee worked to produce natural-language guidebooks and other publications for court decision-makers on technology issues. In an effort to collect information on possible uses of the Ohio Courts Network by court personnel, the Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee conducted feedback sessions throughout the state. About 200 people attended the 10 feedback sessions in February and March 2006. The advisory committee accepted the Ohio Courts Network requirements drafted by the Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee. Parts of the requirements were incorporated into the request for proposals for the proof-of-concept phase of the Ohio Courts Network. Finally, the Infrastructure & Interoperability Subcommittee, having fulfilled its mission and goals, was deactivated by the advisory committee. Advisory Committee on Technology & the Courts Mary Beth Parisi, staff liaison Hon. John P. Bessey, chair Sarah Brown-Clark Hon. James Cissell Tim Collins Joyce Craddock Hon. Dan Favreau Michael Flanagan Hon. Barbara Gorman Hon. Cheryl Grant Gerald Heaton Chief Brad Kunze Tom McDermott Milt Nuzum Gregory Popovich Hon. Jack Puffenberger Greg Scott Walter Wheeler Hon. John Wise Hon. Thomas Zachman Standards Subcommittee The Standards Subcommittee of the advisory committee completed a 90-day comment period in 2006 on proposed Electronic Filing Standards and accepted a revised draft. The completed standards and related documentation are expected to be presented to the advisory committee in early 2007. The Standards Subcommittee also provisionally approved two electronic filing pilot projects in the Lake County Juvenile Court and the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court; reviewed and offered feedback on the uniform electronic citation numbering proposal presented by the Ohio State Highway Patrol; and assisted the Advisory Committee on Court Security & Emergency Preparedness in creating a plan for dealing with an avian flu pandemic. In addition, the Standards Subcommittee reviewed facsimile filing rules submitted by courts throughout the state to ensure compliance with the Facsimile Filing Standards, and began discussing procedures for ensuring compliance with the Civil, Criminal, and Traffic Functional Case Management System Standards. 49
Page 1 and 2:
The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual Re
Page 3: The Supreme Court of Ohio Annual 20
Page 7 and 8: table of contents 2006 2 Justices o
Page 9 and 10: Justice Alice Robie Resnick is the
Page 11 and 12: With his re-election to the Supreme
Page 13 and 14: 2006A look back January A collectio
Page 15 and 16: Oct. 20 Fifteen Ohio judges are sel
Page 17 and 18: Justice Brown (back row, far left)
Page 19 and 20: Justice Resnick with Chief Justice
Page 21 and 22: need to repeatedly visit a Web site
Page 23 and 24: supreme court administrative struct
Page 25 and 26: The Administrative Division is the
Page 27 and 28: The Office of Court Security provid
Page 29 and 30: Visitor Education Center The Visito
Page 31 and 32: In 2006 The Clerk’s Division cons
Page 33 and 34: educed handwriting fatigue and enha
Page 35 and 36: The Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Case
Page 43 and 44: The Legal Resources Division consis
Page 45 and 46: Law Library Updates Information Ser
Page 47 and 48: The Fiscal & Management Resources D
Page 49 and 50: The Employee Events Committee is an
Page 51 and 52: Judiciary/Supreme Court 2006 expend
Page 53: The Information Technology Division
Page 57 and 58: the ohio courts network “All cour
Page 59 and 60: The Facilities Management Division
Page 61 and 62: Meetings & Events The Meetings & Ev
Page 63 and 64: The Office of Court Security organi
Page 65 and 66: The Attorney Services Division is r
Page 67 and 68: Attorney Registration & CLE Section
Page 69 and 70: The Judicial & Court Services Divis
Page 71 and 72: Judicial College The Judicial Colle
Page 73 and 74: Department of Job & Family Services
Page 75 and 76: The Specialized Dockets Section als
Page 77 and 78: Hon. Scott Gwin 5 th District Court
Page 79 and 80: Hon. Richard Rogers 3 rd District C
Page 81 and 82: The supreme Court has the constitut
Page 83 and 84: Five present and former board membe
Page 85 and 86: Ohio Criminal Sentencing Commission
Page 87 and 88: The following is a chronological li
Page 89 and 90: is entitled to exemption of its inv
Page 91 and 92: exception to the state Public Recor
Page 93 and 94: Judgment reversed. Moyer, C.J., O
Page 95 and 96: Orders the Public Utilities Commiss
Page 97 and 98: June Knox Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Kn
Page 99 and 100: Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’
Page 101 and 102: Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lund
Page 103 and 104: Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in p
Page 105 and 106:
October State ex rel. Ohio Democrat
Page 107 and 108:
November In re J.J. Case no. 2006-0
Page 109 and 110:
statements may not be compelled by
Page 111 and 112:
Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Res
Page 113 and 114:
Resnick, Lundberg Stratton and O’
Page 115:
Herb Hungerford, Custodian Herbert
Page 118:
The Supreme Court of Ohio 65 South
show all

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?