29.06.2014 Views

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

Supreme Court of Ohio 2006 Annual Report - Supreme Court - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The supreme <strong>Court</strong> has the constitutional<br />

responsibility to oversee the practice <strong>of</strong> law in the<br />

state, and as a result has developed one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />

comprehensive disciplinary systems <strong>of</strong> any state in<br />

the nation. The <strong>Court</strong> has established three <strong>of</strong>fices to<br />

exercise independent authority in assisting the <strong>Court</strong><br />

in meeting its responsibility as set forth in Section 5(B),<br />

Article IV, <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Ohio</strong> Constitution.<br />

In addition, Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer chairs<br />

the <strong>Ohio</strong> Criminal Sentencing Commission, which<br />

was created by statute in 1990. The commission is<br />

responsible for reviewing <strong>Ohio</strong>’s sentencing statutes<br />

and patterns, and making recommendations regarding<br />

necessary statutory changes.<br />

Office <strong>of</strong> Disciplinary Counsel<br />

The Office <strong>of</strong> Disciplinary Counsel is authorized to investigate<br />

allegations and initiate complaints concerning misconduct<br />

and/or mental illness <strong>of</strong> judges or attorneys under the Code<br />

<strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Responsibility, the Code <strong>of</strong> Judicial Conduct,<br />

and rules governing the unauthorized practice <strong>of</strong> law,<br />

pursuant to the <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> Rules for the Government <strong>of</strong><br />

the Bar and Rules for the Government <strong>of</strong> the Judiciary.<br />

In <strong>2006</strong>, the staff included eight attorneys, one<br />

administrative <strong>of</strong>ficer, one administrative assistant, two<br />

paralegals, two full-time and one part-time investigators, four<br />

legal secretaries, one receptionist, one clerical assistant and<br />

one part-time student law clerk.<br />

During <strong>2006</strong>, the Office <strong>of</strong> Disciplinary Counsel received<br />

3,402 matters for consideration. These included 2,374<br />

grievances filed against attorneys and 566 grievances filed<br />

against judges. Of these, 1,670 grievances were dismissed<br />

at intake upon initial review and 1,263 grievance files were<br />

opened for investigation. The <strong>of</strong>fice also received 329 appeals<br />

<strong>of</strong> grievances previously dismissed by the certified grievance<br />

committees at local bar associations, 66 allegations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unauthorized practice <strong>of</strong> law, five reciprocal discipline actions<br />

and two cases involving the nonpayment <strong>of</strong> child support.<br />

In <strong>2006</strong>, staff attorneys appeared in 17 hearings before<br />

panels <strong>of</strong> the Board <strong>of</strong> Commissioners on Grievances &<br />

Discipline, and participated in 10 oral arguments before the<br />

<strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong>. As a result, 19 resignations were received and<br />

10 resignation cases closed in <strong>2006</strong>.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!