01.07.2014 Views

The Timaeus of Plato

The Timaeus of Plato

The Timaeus of Plato

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

22 INTRODUCTION.<br />

generate a percept without subject. And subject as well as object<br />

is<br />

undergoing perpetual mutation thus, since a change either <strong>of</strong><br />

:<br />

object or <strong>of</strong> subject singly involves a change in the perception,<br />

every perception is continually suffering a tw<strong>of</strong>old alteration.<br />

Perception is therefore an ever-flowing stream, incessantly changing<br />

its character in correspondence with the changes in subject and<br />

in object. Nothing therefore can be more complete than the<br />

absolute instability <strong>of</strong> our sensuous perceptions. <strong>The</strong> importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this theory will be better realised when we view it in the light<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Timaeus</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 21. More important than even the Parmenides is the<br />

Sop is . Sophist, one <strong>of</strong> the most pr<strong>of</strong>ound and far-reaching <strong>of</strong> <strong>Plato</strong>'s<br />

works. <strong>Plato</strong> starts with an endeavour to define the sophist, who,<br />

when accused <strong>of</strong> teaching what seems to be but is not knowledge,<br />

turns upon us, protesting the impossibility <strong>of</strong> predicating notbeing<br />

: it is nonsense to say he teaches what is not, for TO p? oi/<br />

can neither be thought nor uttered. Hereupon follows a truly<br />

masterly examination into the logic <strong>of</strong> being and not-being. <strong>The</strong><br />

result is to show that either <strong>of</strong> the two, viewed in the abstract<br />

and apart from the other, is self-contradictory and unthinkable.<br />

And as being cannot exist without not-being, so unity also, if<br />

it is to have any intelligible existence, must contain in itself the<br />

element <strong>of</strong> plurality ;<br />

one is at the same time one and not-one,<br />

else it has no meaning. <strong>The</strong> failure to grasp<br />

this truth is the<br />

fundamental flaw in Eleatic metaphysics and consequently in the<br />

earlier ideal theory. It seems to me hardly open to doubt that<br />

the eiSwv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!