Changes to Sea Cargo Reporting

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scenario 2 The freight forwarder reports their HBOL cargo report to the ICS before the shipping company reports the OBOL cargo report to the ICS. The initial OBOL cargo report contains incorrect OBOL number, so it is withdrawn and resubmitted with correct the OBOL number. There are no Customs or AQIS interventions. Description of Business Scenario • Freight forwarder reports an HBOL for an FCL container to the ICS using an OBOL number different to that issued by the shipping company . • Shipping company reports the OBOL sea cargo report to the ICS using their OBOL number • Shipping company identifies an error with the OBOL number reported on their sea cargo report and withdraws the sea cargo report • Shipping company corrects OBOL number and resubmits the OBOL sea cargo report to the ICS When the OBOL number reported in the freight forwarder cargo report does not match with the OBOL number reported in the shipping company OBOL cargo report, and the shipping company withdraws and resubmits their cargo report due to an incorrect OBOL number. The current system behaviour and result is: • The shipping company OBOL sea cargo report is rejected, because it is identified as a duplicate of the freight forwarder HBOL sea cargo report by the ICS; • The freight forwarder must withdraw and resubmit their sea cargo report with the correct OBOL number; • The shipping company must resubmit their sea cargo report The changed system behaviour and result is: • The freight forwarder HBOL sea cargo report is accepted by the ICS; • The shipping company OBOL sea cargo report is accepted by the ICS, and the derived OBOL for the freight forwarder HBOL sea cargo report is updated • The derived OBOL for the freight forwarder HBOL sea cargo report is updated with a red “W” to identify it as withdrawn • The resubmitted shipping company OBOL sea cargo report is accepted by the ICS, and the derived OBOL for the freight forwarder HBOL sea cargo report is updated
Scenario 3 The shipping company reports their Ocean Bill before the freight forwarder’s House Bill is reported, and the container is moved underbond to a depot for deconsolidation and outturn. Description of Business Scenario • The shipping company reports an OBOL cargo report for an FCL container consigned to a freight forwarder; • The freight forwarder reports one HBOL cargo report for an LCL consignment in that container using an inaccurate OBOL number; • The container is moved underbond from the wharf to a depot for deconsolidation • This depot submits a Sea Cargo Outturn report for the consolidation, quoting the freight forwarder’s inaccurate OBOL number for the LCL line When the Ocean Bill number on the Sea Cargo Outturn does not match the Ocean Bill number quoted on the Ocean Bill Sea Cargo Report. The current system behaviour and result is: • Freight forwarder’s sea cargo report is accepted, and the correct OBOL is derived from the shipping company’s sea cargo report; • The Sea Cargo Outturn is accepted, but the LCL consignment is identified as surplus The changed system behaviour and result is: • Freight forwarder’s sea cargo report is accepted, and the correct OBOL is derived from the shipping company’s sea cargo report; • The Sea Cargo Outturn links to the LCL consignment and status is generated correctly
Page 1 and 2: Changes to Sea Cargo Reporting (Oce
Page 3 and 4: CONTAINERISED OUTTURNS Sea Cargo Ou
Page 5 and 6: The Underbond Movements View Line s
Page 7 and 8: The Sea Cargo Outturn Line View scr
Page 9: Scenario 1 The freight forwarder re
Page 13: Description of Business Scenario

Changes to Sea Cargo Reporting

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?