06.07.2014 Views

A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch

A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch

A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

extra-posed relative clause that generates discont<strong>in</strong>uity, there are <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>in</strong> the<br />

IL treebanks where even Left-adjo<strong>in</strong>ed relative clauses can be separated from their<br />

head noun by some verbal argument.<br />

(2) iskaa mojuda<br />

Its current swaroop theory<br />

form theory aadharit hai jisko<br />

<strong>based</strong> is which practical<br />

practical aadhirit banaaya jaayega<br />

<strong>based</strong> made will be<br />

‘Its current form is theory <strong>based</strong> which will be made practical <strong>based</strong>.’<br />

<br />

<br />

iskaa<br />

<br />

mojuda_swaroop<br />

<br />

theory_aadharit<br />

hai<br />

<br />

jisko<br />

<br />

practical_aadhirit<br />

banaaya_jaayega<br />

5.2 Clausal Complements<br />

Clausal complements, <strong>in</strong>troduced by a complementizer (ki <strong>in</strong> H<strong>in</strong>di/Urdu, je <strong>in</strong><br />

Bangla), are placed post-verbally <strong>in</strong> H<strong>in</strong>di-Urdu and Bangla. If the head predicate<br />

licens<strong>in</strong>g the clausal complement is other than the verb, the canonical order is such<br />

that the head is positioned preverbally and its complement is extraposed. In such<br />

order the structure has <strong>in</strong>herent discont<strong>in</strong>uity. Example (3) shows an extraposed<br />

complement clause <strong>of</strong> an expletive yaha ‘it’. The head element and the complement<br />

clause are at a distance from each other, the verb likha hai ‘is written’ <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> clause <strong>in</strong>terferes <strong>in</strong> the projection <strong>of</strong> yaha ‘it’ mak<strong>in</strong>g the structure discont<strong>in</strong>uous.<br />

Extraposed complement clauses are the major source <strong>of</strong> non-projective<br />

structures <strong>in</strong> IL treebanks. In H<strong>in</strong>di treebank around 42% non-projective structures<br />

are due to extraposed clausal complements <strong>of</strong> a non-verbal predicate.<br />

(3) jisme<br />

In which yaha<br />

this bhi<br />

also likha<br />

written hai ki<br />

is that Togadiya<br />

Togadiya jordaar<br />

powerful dhmaake me<strong>in</strong> maare<br />

blast <strong>in</strong> killed jaayenge<br />

will be<br />

‘In which this is also written that Togadiya will be killed <strong>in</strong> powerful blast.’<br />

<br />

jisme yaha_bhi likha_hai ki Togadiya jordaar_dhmaake_me<strong>in</strong> maare_jaayenge<br />

5.3 Genitive Constructions<br />

In genitive constructions, the genitive marked nom<strong>in</strong>al is easily dislocated from<br />

the head noun. The study <strong>of</strong> IL treebanks show a varied number <strong>of</strong> movements<br />

from genitive constructions. Genitive marked noun can either be extraposed or<br />

be extracted towards the left. However, the extraction towards left is wide spread<br />

with good number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>stances <strong>in</strong> all the treebanks except Telugu treebank. In<br />

example (5), genitive marked pronoun jiski ‘whose’ has been extracted from its<br />

base position to the sentence <strong>in</strong>itial position cross<strong>in</strong>g the subject <strong>of</strong> the sentence.<br />

(4) jiski raashtra ko bhaari keemat adaa karni padi<br />

for which country ACC heavy cost pay had to<br />

‘For which country had to pay a heavy cost’<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

jiski raashtra_ko bhaari_keemat adaa karni_padi_thi<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

5.4 Control Constructions<br />

In ILs under study, verbs can select non-f<strong>in</strong>ite complements and adverbial clauses<br />

marked with <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itive or participle <strong>in</strong>flections (-kar and -na <strong>in</strong> H<strong>in</strong>di-Urdu). In<br />

such bi-clausal comb<strong>in</strong>ations non-f<strong>in</strong>ite clauses have a null subject controlled by<br />

a syntactic argument <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> verb. In IL treebanks such arguments, which<br />

thematically belong to both the verbs but are syntactically governed only by the<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> verb, are annotated as the child <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> verb only <strong>in</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>in</strong>gleheadedness<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> dependency trees. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>in</strong> these control constructions,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual arguments <strong>of</strong> non-f<strong>in</strong>ite verb can move around and cross the<br />

shared argument, child <strong>of</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> verb, generat<strong>in</strong>g discont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>in</strong> non-f<strong>in</strong>ite<br />

clause. There are varied occurrences <strong>of</strong> such discont<strong>in</strong>uous non-f<strong>in</strong>ite clauses <strong>in</strong><br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!