A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch
A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch
A Treebank-based Investigation of IPP-triggering Verbs in Dutch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ch<strong>in</strong>ese) as the direct object NP. “ 正 在 ” (currently) is analyzed as an adverb,<br />
form<strong>in</strong>g part <strong>of</strong> the VP.<br />
There is no explicit tense mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the sentence. The progressive aspect is<br />
lexically expressed through the adverb “ 正 在 ” (currently), reaffirm<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
fact that there is no morphological change for the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese verb. As a matter<br />
<strong>of</strong> fact, except for a few dependent morphemes <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g plurality, Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
nouns do not have <strong>in</strong>flectional changes. In this sense, the attribute “lemma”<br />
<strong>in</strong> below is not really necessary. In addition, the plural personal<br />
pronoun “ 她 们 ” (they) is fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e, illustrat<strong>in</strong>g one <strong>of</strong> the very few personal<br />
pronouns carry<strong>in</strong>g gender <strong>in</strong>formation. As a general rule, there is no gender<br />
mark<strong>in</strong>g for Ch<strong>in</strong>ese nouns. It is thus questionable whether gender mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />
should be a default attribute. In the current example, such mark<strong>in</strong>g is omitted<br />
for the sake <strong>of</strong> simplicity and clarity.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
51