24.07.2014 Views

pdf - SRON

pdf - SRON

pdf - SRON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 3: SOURCE COUNTS OF THE AXIS SOURCES<br />

Table 3.2 Maximum likelihood fit results to the log N − log S in the Soft band for two<br />

HR selected subsamples. The first column is the band used, the second is the powerlaw<br />

slope above the flux break, the third is the slope below that break, the fourth is the<br />

flux break, the fifth is the normalisation, and the sixth column indicate the number of<br />

sources from each sample used in the fit.<br />

N used /N tot<br />

Band Γ u Γ d S b K AXIS<br />

(10 −14 cg s) (deg −2 )<br />

Soft HR < −0.2 2.33 +0.04<br />

−0.04<br />

1.69 +0.03<br />

−0.04<br />

1.40 +0.20<br />

−0.10<br />

88.7 +5.9<br />

−7.9<br />

1058/1058<br />

Soft HR > −0.2 2.77 +0.07<br />

−0.06<br />

- 1.00 16.9 +0.05<br />

−0.06<br />

209/209<br />

section 3.2.1), it produced gaps in those flux bins which have been depleted of<br />

sources after the splitting of the sample. Since it is extremely difficult to deal<br />

with this problem when the area varies rapidly with the flux (see Fig. 3.1), we<br />

decided to use as a first approximation the Soft Ω(S) for both subsamples. A<br />

similar approach has been used in [125] where they use the corresponding area<br />

curve for each energy band under study.<br />

It can be seen in Fig. 3.6 that the source counts of Soft sources with HR < −0.2<br />

clearly still follows a broken power law model, while for the HR > −0.2 sources<br />

it is a simple power law. The best fit parameters are listed in table 3.2. Those<br />

for the softest sources (HR < −0.2) are fully compatible, well within the 1-σ<br />

errors, with the best fit parameters obtained for the Soft AXIS-only sample (see<br />

table 3.1). This is reasonable, since the AXIS Soft sources with HR < −0.2 are<br />

over 83% of the total Soft sample. However, the Soft HR > −0.2 subsample<br />

best fit parameters are more similar to those obtained for the hard AXIS-only<br />

sample.<br />

In [125] they found similar results using a discriminating value of HR = 0 for<br />

all energy bands in the Chandra Multiwavelength Project (ChaMP). They demostrated<br />

that the missing break is not due to small number statistics, since<br />

the HR < 0 sources largely outnumbered the HR > 0 sources, by performing<br />

simulations in randomly selected subsets of the HR < 0 sample with the same<br />

number of sources as the HR > 0 subsample. They calculated the log N − log S<br />

for these subsets finding that, in spite of the reduced statistics, they all showed<br />

a detectable break. A possible explanation for this behavior is that spectrally<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!