24.07.2014 Views

pdf - SRON

pdf - SRON

pdf - SRON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 4: CLUSTERING OF AXIS AND XMS SOURCES<br />

tion function [17]. Formally, the integral constraint can be estimated by:<br />

W =<br />

∫ ∫<br />

dΩ1 dΩ 1 w(θ)<br />

∫ ∫<br />

dΩ1 dΩ 2<br />

(4.3.5)<br />

where the integral is carried out over the whole area of the survey. However,<br />

given the complicated dependence of the sensitivity with the area of our survey,<br />

we decided to evaluate the integral constraint empirically. To do that, we<br />

calculated the angular correlation function that would have been detected in<br />

the absence of correlation w IC (θ) via the average of N sim simulated realisations<br />

of w(θ), where the real data were replaced by random samples simulated independently<br />

using the method described in section 4.3.1. The w IC (θ) points at<br />

each angular scale are overplotted as triangles in Figs. 4.1 and 4.2, and have<br />

been used to increase the corresponding w(θ), convolving the error bars using<br />

Gaussian statistics.<br />

Our first results to the full sample resulted in a ∼3-σ significant bump at scales<br />

about 200 arcsec, which was also present in the simulations but at lower significance.<br />

The origin of this bump turned out to be in only two fields: HD 111812<br />

and HD 117555. Both fields have stellar clusters in their field of view ([60])<br />

and, since we are only interested in the extragalactic large-scale structure, we<br />

have opted to exclude these two fields from all subsequent angular clustering<br />

analysis.<br />

The observed w(θ) values can be fit to a power law model in the form:<br />

w(θ) =<br />

( θ<br />

θ 0<br />

) −γ<br />

(4.3.6)<br />

The best χ 2 fits to this model are overplotted in Figs. 4.1 and 4.2. The best<br />

fit parameters are listed in table 4.1 along with the significance of the detection<br />

from an F-test, comparing the χ 2 value of a power law model a w(θ) = 0,<br />

no-clustering model. The F-test suggests significant correlation at the ∼99%<br />

confidence level in the Soft and XID bands, whereas no significant clustering<br />

detection is seen the the Hard and Ultrahard bands.<br />

In [72], they find significant angular correlation in the XMM-LSS sample ([183])<br />

in the Soft band with a similar slope γ = 1.2 ± 0.2, and a lower correlation<br />

length θ 0 = 7 ± 3 arcsec, but compatible with ours within ∼1-σ. In [229] find<br />

γ = 0.7 ± 0.3 and θ 0 = 4 ± 3 arcsec, again a lower correlation length than in our<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!