Examination of the intact stability and the seakeeping behaviour
Examination of the intact stability and the seakeeping behaviour
Examination of the intact stability and the seakeeping behaviour
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 <strong>Examination</strong><br />
4.12 Vessel No. 12<br />
Figure 4.23: Lines plan <strong>and</strong> lateral areas <strong>of</strong> Vessel No. 12<br />
Table 4.23: Main dimensions <strong>of</strong> Vessel No. 12<br />
Main dimensions Value Unit<br />
L pp 249.03 [m]<br />
B 32.20 [m]<br />
T D 11.30 [m]<br />
Containers 4,300 [TEU]<br />
Vessel No. 12 has <strong>the</strong> geometric capacity to carry 4, 300 T EU. Having <strong>the</strong> main dimensions<br />
according to table 4.23, it is ano<strong>the</strong>r midsized container vessel which may travel through <strong>the</strong><br />
Panama Canal. The vessel is comparable to Vessel No. 07, which has nearly <strong>the</strong> same<br />
dimensions, a slightly smaller c B value <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore a ner hullform as well as a smaller geometric<br />
TEU capacity. The following characteristics <strong>of</strong> Vessel No. 12 are to be noted:<br />
ˆ The lines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ship shown in gure 4.23 have a c B value <strong>of</strong> 0.65 on design draft.<br />
ˆ The documented bilge keel area is signicant smaller than <strong>the</strong> mean value according to<br />
chapter 3.9.<br />
ˆ The <strong>stability</strong> in ballast arrival loading condition is moderately high resulting in a<br />
GM solid = 7.18 m.<br />
ˆ The limiting <strong>intact</strong> <strong>stability</strong> criterion (Max. GZ at 25 ◦ ) requires a GM min = 1.28 m.<br />
The calculated transversal accelerations on <strong>the</strong> bridge <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rolling angles for <strong>the</strong> three accident<br />
conditions are listed in table 4.24.<br />
Table 4.24: Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>seakeeping</strong> calculation for Vessel No. 12<br />
Accident<br />
[<br />
a<br />
situation t max m/s<br />
2 ] ϕ max [ ◦ ]<br />
Situation 1 10.5 25<br />
Situation 2 11.0 26<br />
Situation 3 14.0 35<br />
The maximum acceleration occurs for accident situation 3. The maximum acceleration is<br />
higher, than for <strong>the</strong> comparable Vessel No. 07. The statistical distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transversal<br />
accelerations in this situation is shown in gure 4.24.<br />
36