Boxoffice-June.19.1948
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
. . Headline<br />
TiJ^t^j^Mt^to^<br />
-pHE IDEAS OF THE GOVERNMENT in<br />
connection with the motion picture industry<br />
antitrust suit were developed fui-ther recently<br />
by the U.S. suprenae court.<br />
In okaying U.S. Steel Co.'s addition of another<br />
west coast unit, the court said in an<br />
opinion written by Justice Stanley F. Reed:<br />
"In United States vs. Paramount Pictures,<br />
we were presented with a situation in which<br />
the government charged that vertical integration<br />
was illegal under the Sherman act.<br />
We held that control by the major producerdistributors<br />
of over nearly three-quarters of<br />
the first run theatres in cities with population<br />
over 100,000 was not of itself illegal, and<br />
we remanded the case to the district court<br />
for further findings.<br />
"In outlining the factors which we considered<br />
to be significant in determing the legality<br />
of vertical integration, we emphasized<br />
the importance of characterizing the natiu-e<br />
of the market to be served, and the leverage<br />
on the market which the particular vertical<br />
integration creates or makes possible.<br />
"A second test which we considered important<br />
in the Paramount case was the purpose<br />
or intent with which the combination<br />
was conceived. When a combination thi-ough<br />
its actual operation results in an unreasonable<br />
restraint, intent or purpose may be inferred;<br />
even though no imreasonable restraint<br />
may be achieved, nevertheless, a finding<br />
of specific intent to accomplish such an<br />
unreasonable restraint may render the actor<br />
liable under the Sherman act.<br />
"It seems clear to us that vertical integration,<br />
as such without more, cannot be<br />
held violative of the Sherman act. It is an<br />
indefinite term without explicit meaning.<br />
Even in the iron industry where could<br />
a line be drawn—at the end of mining the<br />
ore, the production of the pig-iron or steel<br />
ingots, when the rolling mill operation is<br />
completed, fabrication on order or at some<br />
stage of manufacture into standard merchandise?<br />
"No answer would be possible and therefore<br />
the extent of permissible integration<br />
must be governed, as other factors in Sherman<br />
act violations, by the other circumstances<br />
or individual cases. Technological<br />
advances may easily require a basic industry<br />
plant to expand its processes into semi-finished<br />
or finished good so as to produce desired<br />
articles in greater volume and with less<br />
expense.<br />
"It is not for courts to determine the course<br />
of the nation's economic development. Economists<br />
may recommend, the legislative and<br />
executive branches may chart legal courses<br />
by which the competitive forces of business<br />
can seek to reduce costs and increase production<br />
so that a higher standard of living<br />
may be available to all. The evils and dangers<br />
of monopoly and attempts to monopolize<br />
that grow out of size and efforts to eliminate<br />
others from markets, large or small, have<br />
caused Congress and the executive to regulate<br />
commerce and trade in many respects.<br />
But no direction has appeared of a public<br />
poUcy that forbids, per se, an expansion of<br />
facilities of an existing company to meet<br />
the needs of new markets of a community.<br />
^efiont<br />
By LEE 6ARLING<br />
whether that community is nationwide or<br />
countywide.<br />
"On the other hand, the courts have been<br />
given by Congress wide powers in monopoly<br />
regulation. The very broadness of terms such<br />
as restraint of trade, substantial competition<br />
and purpose to monopolize have placed upon<br />
courts the responsibility to apply the Sherman<br />
act so as to avoid the evils at which<br />
Congress aimed. The basic industries, with<br />
few exceptions, do not approach in America<br />
a cartelized form. If businesses are to be forbidden<br />
from entering into different stages of<br />
production that order must come from Congress,<br />
not the courts.<br />
"Applying the standards laid down In the<br />
Paramount case, we conclude that the socalled<br />
vertical integration resulting from the<br />
acquisition of Consolidated does not unreasonably<br />
restrict the opportunities of the competitor<br />
producers of rolled steel to market<br />
their<br />
product."<br />
Observers saw in the opinion that the high<br />
tribunal regards the Paramount case as one<br />
of its basic decisions. They also gleaned a<br />
few other views of court thinking. In the<br />
Paramount case, the majority opinion was<br />
written by Justice William Douglas. Here<br />
we get the views of another member of the<br />
court.<br />
* * *<br />
AT THIS WRITING, the chances appear<br />
bright for a one-year extension of the Reciprocal<br />
trade agreements act by the senate,<br />
instead of the three-year extension as passed<br />
by the house. That might be good as far<br />
as the film industry is concerned.<br />
The industry is supporting the act, and<br />
wants it continued unchanged. The house<br />
modified and weakened the program as regards<br />
the power to reduce U.S. tariffs. The<br />
senate is trying to stiffen it up.<br />
In the subsequent conference with the<br />
house, the senators may be able to stiffen<br />
the measure. And if they don't stiffen it<br />
much, the thought goes, a one-year extension,<br />
instead of a three-year one, would give Congress<br />
a chance within another year to try<br />
for the strong program which has been in<br />
effect<br />
for the past few years.<br />
* * *<br />
A BILL REMOVING the admission tax<br />
on theatre tickets given free to veterans is<br />
now before the President for his signature.<br />
It may seem minor, but until the bill was<br />
passed, it was virtually impossible to give<br />
hospital servicemen and veterans free tickets.<br />
The house passed the bill some months ago<br />
and sent it to the senate which passed it in<br />
an amended form; the house agreed to the<br />
amendments last week and sent the measure<br />
to the White House.<br />
* * *<br />
Who died<br />
REP. THOMAS O'WENS (R., 111.),<br />
June 7 of a heart attack, removes from Congress<br />
one of the men who knew most about<br />
Hollywood labor troubles. He also was somewhat<br />
critical of the industry itself, and during<br />
the hearings last February and March<br />
suggested that perhaps the chief trouble lay<br />
with the failure of the producers to use the<br />
facilities of the National Labor Relations<br />
board.<br />
Convention io Be Aired<br />
By 18 Tele Stations<br />
Philadelphia—Eighteen television stations<br />
from Richmond, Va., north to Boston<br />
will broadcast the Republican and<br />
Democratic nominating conventions. The<br />
Republican convention will start Monday,<br />
June 21. It will be the largest television<br />
network hookup.<br />
Four networks—ABC, CBS, Du Mont,<br />
NBC—and six television stations will cooperate<br />
in pooling coverage of the conventions.<br />
The individual stations are:<br />
WATV, WPIX, WMAR-TV, WFIL-TV,"<br />
WCAU-TV and WPTZ. The last three<br />
are Philadelphia stations.<br />
Vog Helping to Finance<br />
Picture Made in France<br />
NEW YORK—Vog Film Co., which is distributing<br />
the French film "Jenny Lamour"<br />
in the U.S., is helping to finance "Manon,"<br />
a new picture now before the cameras in<br />
Paris, in exchange for American distribution.<br />
This is the first American-Franco financing<br />
deal, according to Noel Meadow, Vog executive.<br />
The film is being directed by Henri-Georges<br />
Clouzot, who also directed "Jenny Lamour"<br />
and "The Raven," and stars Cecil Aubry.<br />
Vog Film is now working out financial backing<br />
for a second French production, Meadow<br />
said.<br />
FROM THE FILES OF<br />
^O j/feard ^^Ar^o<br />
JESSE L. LASKY, Paramount first vicepresident,<br />
predicts that other nations will<br />
some day send diplomatic representatives to<br />
Hollywood to advise motion picture producers<br />
on pictiu-es having foreign locales. As a step<br />
in that direction, George Kates has been appointed<br />
as "counselor on foreign affairs."<br />
With an office in the Paramount studio,<br />
Kates will advise scenario writers and directors<br />
during the preparation and filming of all<br />
pictures and portions of pictures containing<br />
foreign elements.<br />
Tiffany-Stahl Productions has engaged six<br />
expert dressmakers for creation of gowns for<br />
their various stars. This department is presided<br />
over by Madame Alphreda, w^-known<br />
designer who was connected with the Bon<br />
Marche of Paris for many years. John M.<br />
Stahl, vice-president, supervising production,<br />
believes clothes play an important part in a<br />
production.<br />
* * •<br />
Razzing the News Department: The mortgage<br />
holders of an Illinois theatre removed<br />
the seats of the house while the show was<br />
in progress. That's what we call playing to<br />
standing room only ... A news story says<br />
that as an exploitation stimt a wedding<br />
gown was placed in a window to draw in-<br />
.<br />
terest. A wedding ring in a hock shop will<br />
do the same thing says: "Tax<br />
on Seats Proposed." Wrong place for tacks,<br />
Mr. Exhibitor!<br />
28<br />
BOXOFFICE<br />
: : June 19, 1948