29.07.2014 Views

Boxoffice-June.19.1948

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

. . Headline<br />

TiJ^t^j^Mt^to^<br />

-pHE IDEAS OF THE GOVERNMENT in<br />

connection with the motion picture industry<br />

antitrust suit were developed fui-ther recently<br />

by the U.S. suprenae court.<br />

In okaying U.S. Steel Co.'s addition of another<br />

west coast unit, the court said in an<br />

opinion written by Justice Stanley F. Reed:<br />

"In United States vs. Paramount Pictures,<br />

we were presented with a situation in which<br />

the government charged that vertical integration<br />

was illegal under the Sherman act.<br />

We held that control by the major producerdistributors<br />

of over nearly three-quarters of<br />

the first run theatres in cities with population<br />

over 100,000 was not of itself illegal, and<br />

we remanded the case to the district court<br />

for further findings.<br />

"In outlining the factors which we considered<br />

to be significant in determing the legality<br />

of vertical integration, we emphasized<br />

the importance of characterizing the natiu-e<br />

of the market to be served, and the leverage<br />

on the market which the particular vertical<br />

integration creates or makes possible.<br />

"A second test which we considered important<br />

in the Paramount case was the purpose<br />

or intent with which the combination<br />

was conceived. When a combination thi-ough<br />

its actual operation results in an unreasonable<br />

restraint, intent or purpose may be inferred;<br />

even though no imreasonable restraint<br />

may be achieved, nevertheless, a finding<br />

of specific intent to accomplish such an<br />

unreasonable restraint may render the actor<br />

liable under the Sherman act.<br />

"It seems clear to us that vertical integration,<br />

as such without more, cannot be<br />

held violative of the Sherman act. It is an<br />

indefinite term without explicit meaning.<br />

Even in the iron industry where could<br />

a line be drawn—at the end of mining the<br />

ore, the production of the pig-iron or steel<br />

ingots, when the rolling mill operation is<br />

completed, fabrication on order or at some<br />

stage of manufacture into standard merchandise?<br />

"No answer would be possible and therefore<br />

the extent of permissible integration<br />

must be governed, as other factors in Sherman<br />

act violations, by the other circumstances<br />

or individual cases. Technological<br />

advances may easily require a basic industry<br />

plant to expand its processes into semi-finished<br />

or finished good so as to produce desired<br />

articles in greater volume and with less<br />

expense.<br />

"It is not for courts to determine the course<br />

of the nation's economic development. Economists<br />

may recommend, the legislative and<br />

executive branches may chart legal courses<br />

by which the competitive forces of business<br />

can seek to reduce costs and increase production<br />

so that a higher standard of living<br />

may be available to all. The evils and dangers<br />

of monopoly and attempts to monopolize<br />

that grow out of size and efforts to eliminate<br />

others from markets, large or small, have<br />

caused Congress and the executive to regulate<br />

commerce and trade in many respects.<br />

But no direction has appeared of a public<br />

poUcy that forbids, per se, an expansion of<br />

facilities of an existing company to meet<br />

the needs of new markets of a community.<br />

^efiont<br />

By LEE 6ARLING<br />

whether that community is nationwide or<br />

countywide.<br />

"On the other hand, the courts have been<br />

given by Congress wide powers in monopoly<br />

regulation. The very broadness of terms such<br />

as restraint of trade, substantial competition<br />

and purpose to monopolize have placed upon<br />

courts the responsibility to apply the Sherman<br />

act so as to avoid the evils at which<br />

Congress aimed. The basic industries, with<br />

few exceptions, do not approach in America<br />

a cartelized form. If businesses are to be forbidden<br />

from entering into different stages of<br />

production that order must come from Congress,<br />

not the courts.<br />

"Applying the standards laid down In the<br />

Paramount case, we conclude that the socalled<br />

vertical integration resulting from the<br />

acquisition of Consolidated does not unreasonably<br />

restrict the opportunities of the competitor<br />

producers of rolled steel to market<br />

their<br />

product."<br />

Observers saw in the opinion that the high<br />

tribunal regards the Paramount case as one<br />

of its basic decisions. They also gleaned a<br />

few other views of court thinking. In the<br />

Paramount case, the majority opinion was<br />

written by Justice William Douglas. Here<br />

we get the views of another member of the<br />

court.<br />

* * *<br />

AT THIS WRITING, the chances appear<br />

bright for a one-year extension of the Reciprocal<br />

trade agreements act by the senate,<br />

instead of the three-year extension as passed<br />

by the house. That might be good as far<br />

as the film industry is concerned.<br />

The industry is supporting the act, and<br />

wants it continued unchanged. The house<br />

modified and weakened the program as regards<br />

the power to reduce U.S. tariffs. The<br />

senate is trying to stiffen it up.<br />

In the subsequent conference with the<br />

house, the senators may be able to stiffen<br />

the measure. And if they don't stiffen it<br />

much, the thought goes, a one-year extension,<br />

instead of a three-year one, would give Congress<br />

a chance within another year to try<br />

for the strong program which has been in<br />

effect<br />

for the past few years.<br />

* * *<br />

A BILL REMOVING the admission tax<br />

on theatre tickets given free to veterans is<br />

now before the President for his signature.<br />

It may seem minor, but until the bill was<br />

passed, it was virtually impossible to give<br />

hospital servicemen and veterans free tickets.<br />

The house passed the bill some months ago<br />

and sent it to the senate which passed it in<br />

an amended form; the house agreed to the<br />

amendments last week and sent the measure<br />

to the White House.<br />

* * *<br />

Who died<br />

REP. THOMAS O'WENS (R., 111.),<br />

June 7 of a heart attack, removes from Congress<br />

one of the men who knew most about<br />

Hollywood labor troubles. He also was somewhat<br />

critical of the industry itself, and during<br />

the hearings last February and March<br />

suggested that perhaps the chief trouble lay<br />

with the failure of the producers to use the<br />

facilities of the National Labor Relations<br />

board.<br />

Convention io Be Aired<br />

By 18 Tele Stations<br />

Philadelphia—Eighteen television stations<br />

from Richmond, Va., north to Boston<br />

will broadcast the Republican and<br />

Democratic nominating conventions. The<br />

Republican convention will start Monday,<br />

June 21. It will be the largest television<br />

network hookup.<br />

Four networks—ABC, CBS, Du Mont,<br />

NBC—and six television stations will cooperate<br />

in pooling coverage of the conventions.<br />

The individual stations are:<br />

WATV, WPIX, WMAR-TV, WFIL-TV,"<br />

WCAU-TV and WPTZ. The last three<br />

are Philadelphia stations.<br />

Vog Helping to Finance<br />

Picture Made in France<br />

NEW YORK—Vog Film Co., which is distributing<br />

the French film "Jenny Lamour"<br />

in the U.S., is helping to finance "Manon,"<br />

a new picture now before the cameras in<br />

Paris, in exchange for American distribution.<br />

This is the first American-Franco financing<br />

deal, according to Noel Meadow, Vog executive.<br />

The film is being directed by Henri-Georges<br />

Clouzot, who also directed "Jenny Lamour"<br />

and "The Raven," and stars Cecil Aubry.<br />

Vog Film is now working out financial backing<br />

for a second French production, Meadow<br />

said.<br />

FROM THE FILES OF<br />

^O j/feard ^^Ar^o<br />

JESSE L. LASKY, Paramount first vicepresident,<br />

predicts that other nations will<br />

some day send diplomatic representatives to<br />

Hollywood to advise motion picture producers<br />

on pictiu-es having foreign locales. As a step<br />

in that direction, George Kates has been appointed<br />

as "counselor on foreign affairs."<br />

With an office in the Paramount studio,<br />

Kates will advise scenario writers and directors<br />

during the preparation and filming of all<br />

pictures and portions of pictures containing<br />

foreign elements.<br />

Tiffany-Stahl Productions has engaged six<br />

expert dressmakers for creation of gowns for<br />

their various stars. This department is presided<br />

over by Madame Alphreda, w^-known<br />

designer who was connected with the Bon<br />

Marche of Paris for many years. John M.<br />

Stahl, vice-president, supervising production,<br />

believes clothes play an important part in a<br />

production.<br />

* * •<br />

Razzing the News Department: The mortgage<br />

holders of an Illinois theatre removed<br />

the seats of the house while the show was<br />

in progress. That's what we call playing to<br />

standing room only ... A news story says<br />

that as an exploitation stimt a wedding<br />

gown was placed in a window to draw in-<br />

.<br />

terest. A wedding ring in a hock shop will<br />

do the same thing says: "Tax<br />

on Seats Proposed." Wrong place for tacks,<br />

Mr. Exhibitor!<br />

28<br />

BOXOFFICE<br />

: : June 19, 1948

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!