comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Petersburg</strong>, Florida<br />
Appendix A – Management Letter Comments<br />
September 30, 2010<br />
In planning and performing our audit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>financial</strong> statements <strong>of</strong> the governmental activities,<br />
business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate discretely presented component unit and<br />
remaining fund information <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Petersburg</strong>, Florida (the “<strong>City</strong>”), as <strong>of</strong> and for the year<br />
ended September 30, 2010, which collectively comprise the <strong>City</strong>’s basic <strong>financial</strong> statements, we<br />
considered its internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
expressing our opinions on the basic <strong>financial</strong> statements and not to provide assurance on internal<br />
control.<br />
Current Year Observations and Recommendations:<br />
Segregation <strong>of</strong> Duties over Investments<br />
Observation: During the year, one employee had the ability to initiate and approve investment<br />
transactions. This same employee also prepared the quarterly investment <strong>report</strong>s which are<br />
reviewed by management.<br />
Recommendation: We recommend that the <strong>City</strong> establish procedures where the responsibilities<br />
<strong>of</strong> initiation, approval, and recording transactions are performed by different individuals. This<br />
would provide adequate segregation <strong>of</strong> duties and strengthen controls over investments.<br />
Management’s Response: The <strong>City</strong> has already implemented new segregation <strong>of</strong> duties as the<br />
aforementioned employee is no longer employed by the <strong>City</strong> and the responsibilities were<br />
divided to separate the investment authorization, execution, recording and <strong>report</strong>ing<br />
responsibilities to various employees within the Finance Department.<br />
Availability <strong>of</strong> Receivables<br />
Observation: The <strong>City</strong>’s policies require for receivables to be collected within 60 days in order<br />
to be <strong>report</strong>ed on the fund level <strong>financial</strong> statements. It was noted that the <strong>City</strong> had number <strong>of</strong><br />
general fund receivables related to miscellaneous charges and fees which were not collectible<br />
within 60 days <strong>of</strong> year end. This resulted in an audit adjustment to write down accounts<br />
receivable by approximately $900,000 on the fund level statements.<br />
Recommendation: We recommend that the <strong>City</strong> review the nature <strong>of</strong> accounts receivable<br />
maintained at year end to assess the availability <strong>of</strong> these funds to be <strong>report</strong>ed on the fund level<br />
<strong>financial</strong> statements.<br />
Management’s Response: The <strong>City</strong> will implement a new procedure where all receivables will<br />
be evaluated to ensure that they are collected within the 60 day availability period, and any<br />
amounts not collected during that time will be adjusted accordingly on the <strong>financial</strong> statements.<br />
H-20