comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
comprehensive annual financial report - City of St. Petersburg
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. <strong>Petersburg</strong>, FL<br />
Management’s Discussion and Analysis<br />
For the Year Ended September 30, 2010<br />
Unaudited<br />
Business-Type Activities<br />
Business-type activities change in net assets decreased by $13.1 million from the prior year. The<br />
decrease was due primarily to a decrease in capital grants and contribution revenue <strong>of</strong> $7.3<br />
million as there were certain one-time grants in the prior year; a decrease <strong>of</strong> 1.4 million (0.9%) in<br />
charges for services; and a decrease <strong>of</strong> $3.5 million in other revenues which includes investment<br />
income as investment earnings are down from the prior year. Transfers from business-type<br />
activities decreased by $1.4 million during 2010.<br />
Expenses for the water and wastewater utility increased $2.4 million, or 2.5% due to increased<br />
costs for water from Tampa Bay Water. <strong>St</strong>ormwater utility expenses increased 3.1%, Sanitation<br />
expenses increased 2.2%, and the Port, Marina and The Jamestown Complex also experienced<br />
increases in expenses. Other business-type activities also decreased expenses, including a<br />
decrease <strong>of</strong> $547,518 (9.3%) in expenses relating to the Mahaffey Theater complex, and a<br />
decrease in expenses <strong>of</strong> $397,896 (9.4%) relating to the <strong>City</strong>’s golf course operations.<br />
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF CITY FUNDS<br />
As noted earlier, the <strong>City</strong> uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with<br />
finance-related legal requirements.<br />
Governmental Funds<br />
The focus <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-term inflows,<br />
outflows, and balances <strong>of</strong> spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing the <strong>City</strong>’s<br />
financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure <strong>of</strong><br />
a government’s net resources available for spending at the end <strong>of</strong> the fiscal year. During 2010 the<br />
<strong>City</strong> early implemented GASB 54,”Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type<br />
Definitions”. The new standard replaces the previous reserved, unreserved, and designated fund<br />
balance categories with five classifications: nonspendable fund balance, restricted fund balance,<br />
committed fund balance, assigned fund balance, and unassigned fund balance.<br />
Fund balances are the differences between assets and liabilities in a governmental fund. The<br />
nonspendable fund balance includes amounts that are not in spendable form, or amounts that are<br />
required to be maintained intact. Restricted fund balance include amounts that can be spent only<br />
for the specific purposes stipulated by external providers, such as grant providers or bondholders,<br />
as well as amounts that are restricted constitutionally or through legislation. Committed fund<br />
balance includes amounts that can be used only for the specific purposes that are determined by a<br />
formal action <strong>of</strong> the government’s highest level <strong>of</strong> decision making authority. Assigned fund<br />
B - 12