04.09.2014 Views

disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

disciplinary handbook: volume v - Supreme Court - State of Ohio

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sabol, Disciplinary Counsel v.<br />

118 <strong>Ohio</strong> St.3d 65, 2008-<strong>Ohio</strong>-1594. Decided 4/9/2008.<br />

Case Summaries- 287<br />

Respondent missed the deadline for refiling a client‘s personal injury lawsuit and failed to inform the<br />

client he did not have pr<strong>of</strong>essional liability insurance. In July 1999, he agreed to file a lawsuit for a man<br />

injured in a motorcycle accident. He filed the action in July 2001, but the case proceeded slowly, in<br />

part because <strong>of</strong> respondent‘s failure to respond to defendant‘s discovery requests and the fact that the<br />

defendant‘s insurance company had filed bankruptcy. In August 2003, he and the client agreed to<br />

voluntarily dismiss the case and refile it after the after the bankruptcy stay was lifted and some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

client‘s medical problems were resolved. He notified opposing counsel in August 2003, but did not file<br />

a notice <strong>of</strong> dismissal until February 2004. He realized he had only one year to refile, but he incorrectly<br />

notated the deadline as February 2, 2006. He discovered his error in January 2006. He immediately<br />

told the client to consult another lawyer about the potential malpractice claim. He had no insurance and<br />

did not inform the client he lacked coverage. The clients sued and they settled for $12,500 which<br />

respondent has paid in full. Panel and board found violations <strong>of</strong> DR 1-102(A)(5) and 6-101(A)(3) and<br />

recommended a six-month suspension stayed. In mitigation, respondent cooperated and made<br />

restitution. BCGD Proc.Reg. 10(B)(2)(c) and (d). In aggravation, respondent received a public<br />

reprimand for dismissing personal injury claims <strong>of</strong> a woman and her daughter without their consent in<br />

Allen Cty. Bar v. Sabol (1997), 79 <strong>Ohio</strong> St. 3d 387. The court adopted the findings <strong>of</strong> violations <strong>of</strong> DR<br />

1-102(A)(5) and 6-101(A)(3) but disagreed with the recommended sanction because his history <strong>of</strong><br />

unacceptable conduct and his impermissible action in this case warranted a stricter sanction than a fully<br />

stayed suspension. The court ordered a suspension for six months. Citations to Rose (2007) and Gerren<br />

(2006).<br />

Rules Violated: DR 1-102(A)(5), 6-101(A)(3)<br />

Aggravation: (a)<br />

Mitigation: (c), (d)<br />

Prior Discipline: YES Procedure/ Process Issues: NO Criminal Conduct: NO<br />

Public Official: NO Sanction: Six-month suspension

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!