03.10.2014 Views

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PS Those who die with the most letters win.<br />

17024 Letter: This Practical Approach Has Been Lacking in Seminars<br />

ASQ Staff<br />

Sep-18-03<br />

John Dew's 7 taxonomies are the most fundamental, down to earth and practical<br />

observations I've read on root cause analysis ("The Seven Deadly Sins of <strong>Quality</strong><br />

Management," September 2003, p. 59). I am an active member in Nadcap and a voting<br />

member on the Nadcap Heat Treat Task Group. Root and cause and corrective action has<br />

been the sinlge greatest area of weakness identified in the entire defence contractor base.<br />

Dew deserves a standing ovation <strong>for</strong> this article. When he states that "An appropriate rule<br />

of thumb is....to dig until you reach the point of admitting something really embarrassing<br />

about the organization"... is something he obviously has earned from exprerience. This<br />

practical approach is what's been lacking in industry seminars and classes. We live in a<br />

real world with real people per<strong>for</strong>ming real jobs. The mechanics of quality control should<br />

never overshadow the understanding that people still manufacture, per<strong>for</strong>m, and are<br />

responsible <strong>for</strong> making quality decisions every day.<br />

Stuart Sherman<br />

<strong>Quality</strong> Director<br />

Metallurgical Processing Inc.<br />

New Britain, CT<br />

ssherman@mpimetaltreating.com<br />

17023 Letter: People Surveyed Didn't Understand <strong>Quality</strong> Systems<br />

ASQ Staff<br />

Sep-18-03<br />

When I read Robert Karaszewski's "World View" column "<strong>Quality</strong> and the World's<br />

Largest Corporations" (September 2003, p. 86), it appeared the people in the survey were<br />

not educated in the present quality management systems. Below is an analysis of what I<br />

feel is the way the system really works. If management is properly trained I believe they<br />

will see it as I do. Please let me know your feelings about this.If we look at the various<br />

management systems used in a business, they can be listed as follows: A? Top<br />

management system: At this level the system starts with the owner or board of directors.<br />

It is the policies established to guide and measure the organization and to insure that the<br />

planning <strong>for</strong> the future is under control an that a feed back process exist from the<br />

customer, the stock holder, the suppliers and the community to insure they are happy with<br />

the company. Every owner or board of directors has a process, which is very complex to<br />

get in<strong>for</strong>mation that allows <strong>for</strong> good decision-making. The processes below are<br />

supporting systems <strong>for</strong> top management.<br />

a. Sales management system,<br />

b. Accounting or financial management system,<br />

c. Human Resource management system.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!