Quality Progress - American Society for Quality
Quality Progress - American Society for Quality
Quality Progress - American Society for Quality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PS Those who die with the most letters win.<br />
17024 Letter: This Practical Approach Has Been Lacking in Seminars<br />
ASQ Staff<br />
Sep-18-03<br />
John Dew's 7 taxonomies are the most fundamental, down to earth and practical<br />
observations I've read on root cause analysis ("The Seven Deadly Sins of <strong>Quality</strong><br />
Management," September 2003, p. 59). I am an active member in Nadcap and a voting<br />
member on the Nadcap Heat Treat Task Group. Root and cause and corrective action has<br />
been the sinlge greatest area of weakness identified in the entire defence contractor base.<br />
Dew deserves a standing ovation <strong>for</strong> this article. When he states that "An appropriate rule<br />
of thumb is....to dig until you reach the point of admitting something really embarrassing<br />
about the organization"... is something he obviously has earned from exprerience. This<br />
practical approach is what's been lacking in industry seminars and classes. We live in a<br />
real world with real people per<strong>for</strong>ming real jobs. The mechanics of quality control should<br />
never overshadow the understanding that people still manufacture, per<strong>for</strong>m, and are<br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> making quality decisions every day.<br />
Stuart Sherman<br />
<strong>Quality</strong> Director<br />
Metallurgical Processing Inc.<br />
New Britain, CT<br />
ssherman@mpimetaltreating.com<br />
17023 Letter: People Surveyed Didn't Understand <strong>Quality</strong> Systems<br />
ASQ Staff<br />
Sep-18-03<br />
When I read Robert Karaszewski's "World View" column "<strong>Quality</strong> and the World's<br />
Largest Corporations" (September 2003, p. 86), it appeared the people in the survey were<br />
not educated in the present quality management systems. Below is an analysis of what I<br />
feel is the way the system really works. If management is properly trained I believe they<br />
will see it as I do. Please let me know your feelings about this.If we look at the various<br />
management systems used in a business, they can be listed as follows: A? Top<br />
management system: At this level the system starts with the owner or board of directors.<br />
It is the policies established to guide and measure the organization and to insure that the<br />
planning <strong>for</strong> the future is under control an that a feed back process exist from the<br />
customer, the stock holder, the suppliers and the community to insure they are happy with<br />
the company. Every owner or board of directors has a process, which is very complex to<br />
get in<strong>for</strong>mation that allows <strong>for</strong> good decision-making. The processes below are<br />
supporting systems <strong>for</strong> top management.<br />
a. Sales management system,<br />
b. Accounting or financial management system,<br />
c. Human Resource management system.