03.10.2014 Views

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

Quality Progress - American Society for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16531 Re: Letter: Knowing the Basics Is Just as Important as Knowing the Theory<br />

Steven Prevette<br />

Jul-14-03<br />

I certainly agree that you must know both the basics and the theory. Knowing only<br />

theory without any basics can have its shortcomings, as well as knowing the basics<br />

without any theory. I would suggest the second case is more "dangerous" than the first.<br />

Knowing the basics without any theory behind them generally creates a "hack" (Dr.<br />

Deming's used this term <strong>for</strong> this situation). I can say my intent was only to provide an<br />

introduction to the concepts in Systems Thinking, and to introdue the reading that there<br />

are other concepts out there than just Six Sigma. I did provide some internet and book<br />

references so that those who would like to continue onwards and learn the basics can do<br />

so. I myself would be plenty willing to write follow-on article(s), but I don't know if I<br />

could do justice to the great books that are already out there, especially The New<br />

Economics and Out of the Crisis (by Dr. Deming).<br />

Steve Prevette<br />

one of the authors of the "multiple choice" articles.<br />

16526 Letter: Knowing the Basics Is Just as Important as Knowing the Theory<br />

ASQ Staff<br />

Jul-14-03<br />

I just finished reading "Multiple Choice" in the July 2003 edition of <strong>Quality</strong> <strong>Progress</strong> (p.<br />

25). The statement was made in the opening comments that you were looking to meet<br />

customer needs, one in particular being the many requests <strong>for</strong> help in "starting a quality<br />

program." I don't believe those articles would help. In fact, I sometimes feel the quality<br />

literature has lost its way because there is much diversity preached but not enough<br />

foundational in<strong>for</strong>mation. Sports and quality have one one key element in common; you<br />

must be grounded in the fundamentals. For someone trying to establish a quality system,<br />

they must have all of the basics covered. In sports competition, you have many teams that<br />

all play under the same rules. It seems the perennial winners have a high level of<br />

discipline <strong>for</strong> the fundamentals; physical training, practice over and over until you really<br />

have it down and making the fewest errors. My title is quality "assurance" which means<br />

I'm responsible <strong>for</strong> "assuring quality." In years past it was quality of the product thru<br />

establishing a good quality practices. It has now expanded to quality of the systems,<br />

including those outside of quality. To do that you must have a thorough understanding of<br />

the various processes and systems. All the literature preaches continual improvement and<br />

adding value. However, unless you have control of the processes and systems, you can't<br />

improve them. It's no different than the basis of SPC; you can't determine capability if it's<br />

not in control. All of the systems discussed, except <strong>for</strong> the ISO 9001 standard which<br />

defines minimum requirements <strong>for</strong> a quality system, are refinements of this. They deal<br />

with per<strong>for</strong>mance, optimizing processes and systems, and the theoretical. As a general<br />

statment, most of us are in business to deliver products and services while consultants<br />

and educators deliver theory. Theory is excellent as a catalyst <strong>for</strong> change, but you must

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!