27.10.2014 Views

Spring 11 MASTER.indd - Thunderbird Magazine

Spring 11 MASTER.indd - Thunderbird Magazine

Spring 11 MASTER.indd - Thunderbird Magazine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

faculty focus<br />

Protecting know-how<br />

In China, process is both simple and complex<br />

BY ANDREAS SCHOTTER AND MARY TEAGARDEN<br />

In 2010, almost a decade<br />

after China’s admission to<br />

the World Trade Organization,<br />

the ability to protect<br />

intellectual property (IP) or<br />

other corporate know-how<br />

in China remains one of the<br />

most critical issues for foreign<br />

multinational corporations,<br />

especially for those doing<br />

business in the high-tech and<br />

service sectors.<br />

Surprisingly little research<br />

has investigated IP protection<br />

outside the traditional<br />

litigation and mitigation approach.<br />

Previous studies fall<br />

short in providing a comprehensive<br />

understanding about<br />

successful IP protection activities<br />

that work. Our research<br />

intends to correct this.<br />

We conducted more than<br />

97 in-depth interviews with<br />

executives from 50 multinational<br />

corporations, IP protection<br />

specialists, business<br />

consultants and government<br />

agencies. Many executives<br />

were <strong>Thunderbird</strong> alumni or<br />

friends. We sought answers to<br />

three overarching questions:<br />

• What are the key environmental<br />

issues for “IP Protection”<br />

in China?<br />

• How are foreign and local<br />

companies protecting their IP<br />

in China?<br />

• Are there “best practices”<br />

or common themes among<br />

companies?<br />

NEW CHINA<br />

REALITIES<br />

China is no longer simply<br />

the low-cost “workshop of<br />

Mary Teagarden, Ph.D.<br />

Andreas Schotter, Ph.D.<br />

the world.” While China still<br />

manufactures most of the<br />

world’s toys, footwear and<br />

consumer electronics, exports<br />

from China’s high-tech industries<br />

grew from 6 percent to<br />

more than 30 percent during<br />

the past two decades.<br />

In China, multinational<br />

companies can no longer<br />

compete with offerings based<br />

on previous-generation or<br />

“old” technology. They have<br />

to offer their most advanced<br />

know-how, despite the fact<br />

that, for many, China is<br />

synonymous with intellectual<br />

property theft. Consider the<br />

following incidents reported<br />

to us:<br />

• Several years ago, an Intel<br />

employee in China took<br />

intellectual property to<br />

AMD, the company’s main<br />

competitor. The value of<br />

the lost IP was estimated<br />

close to $1 billion.<br />

• Recently, a Ford employee<br />

took more than 4,000 confidential<br />

business documents<br />

and used them to<br />

secure a job with a Chinese<br />

auto manufacturer. Currently,<br />

Renault executives<br />

are being scrutinized for<br />

similar behavior.<br />

• Pfizer has taken several<br />

trademark cases to Chinese<br />

and international courts<br />

and received a ruling that<br />

Viagra is a valid trademark.<br />

The courts ordered two<br />

Chinese companies to<br />

stop producing counterfeit<br />

pills. Pfizer still struggles<br />

with the enforcement of<br />

the ruling through local<br />

authorities.<br />

WHAT DRIVES IP<br />

LEAKAGE?<br />

China’s unique sociocultural<br />

history contributes<br />

to IP theft in China. For<br />

example, students learn by<br />

copying their master. The<br />

perfect copy is considered a<br />

compliment for the original.<br />

Further, there are very low<br />

marginal costs for IP theft<br />

(including very limited prosecution)<br />

compared with the<br />

costs associated with R&D.<br />

One general manager stated:<br />

“Widespread IP leakage<br />

will persist until it is more<br />

expensive to copy than it is<br />

to innovate.” Finally, a high<br />

turnover rate of knowledge<br />

workers, well-educated middle<br />

managers and engineers<br />

causes a constant “bleeding”<br />

of corporate know-how.<br />

The unfortunate reality<br />

is that in China, eventually<br />

all intellectual property<br />

leaks. Some leakage is faster<br />

and some slower. Success<br />

in China requires diligent<br />

control paired with proactive,<br />

dynamic management of IP<br />

leakage. Passive overreliance<br />

on an immature legal system<br />

is ineffective.<br />

IP PROTECTION THAT<br />

WORKS<br />

Despite challenges, many<br />

multinational corporations<br />

have high-tech investments<br />

in China, and a fair number<br />

do a good job protecting<br />

IP using a variety of<br />

mechanisms. We found three<br />

specific levels of IP protection<br />

mechanisms that are<br />

required in combination for<br />

success:<br />

• Explicit strategic clarity<br />

about a firm’s China<br />

activities.<br />

• Establishment of a set of<br />

activities that follow core<br />

IP protection procedures,<br />

including context-relevant<br />

legal diligence and business<br />

intelligence — we<br />

refer to this as keep it<br />

simple (KISS).<br />

• An intertwined arrange-<br />

CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE<br />

52 spring 20<strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!