28.10.2014 Views

Native Habitat Inventory Final Report 2004 - St. Lucie County

Native Habitat Inventory Final Report 2004 - St. Lucie County

Native Habitat Inventory Final Report 2004 - St. Lucie County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

first created. Then a current 2002 land cover was created. For each coverage, all<br />

polygons (more than 132,000) were classified as natural or non-natural. The difference<br />

between these two coverages provided the acres of natural habitat lost and the number of<br />

acres conserved over the time period.<br />

By 2002, 19,417 acres of land had been conserved. However, in comparison to the<br />

surrounding counties this is quite low (Table 2). Also, the natural areas that remain are<br />

highly fragmented.<br />

Table 2. Comparison of Area Preserved by <strong>County</strong> as of December 2003<br />

Source: FNAI Managed Areas shapefile December 2003<br />

<strong>County</strong> Total Acres within<br />

the <strong>County</strong><br />

Total Acres<br />

Conserved<br />

Percent of the<br />

<strong>County</strong> Conserved<br />

<strong>St</strong>. <strong>Lucie</strong> 391,700 19,417 5<br />

Indian River 318,080 >100,000 31<br />

Okeechobee 493,440 >75,000 15<br />

Martin 355,200 >66,000 19<br />

Site Data Summaries<br />

The <strong>County</strong> ESL Program goals of increasing acreage of native habitat preserved as well<br />

as preservation of unique communities and species requires the use of both countywide<br />

and more site-specific, localized ecological information to make wise land-use and land<br />

planning decisions. This need for site-specific information was the basis for conducting<br />

this inventory.<br />

The 30 sites (40,142 acres) that were surveyed represented different vegetative<br />

communities and locations in the <strong>County</strong>. The vegetative communities of the sites<br />

ranged from coastal uplands to wet flatlands. The sites ranged in size from 1 acre to<br />

28,789 acres. Table 3 provides a summary of the ecological characteristics including<br />

content and context for all the sites. Figure 1 provides a map of the A, B, and C-ranked<br />

sites.<br />

Four sites (4, 9, 43, and 44) were not accessible by ground due to constraints of owner<br />

access (31,499 acres). They were assessed via helicopter by county staff. All four of these<br />

sites are expected to be of high quality based on other data sources (e.g., Fernauld 1989,<br />

Johnson and Muller 1990, KBN 1992) and the aerial reconnaissance.<br />

In the eastern third of the county the natural resources on a site were most affected by<br />

development, whereas, in the western two-thirds of the county they were influenced by<br />

intensive agriculture (e.g., cattle grazing and citrus groves). This is true for both uplands<br />

and wetlands. Agricultural activities directly impact an area by replacing or removing the<br />

overstory, removing small scale topographic variation, collapsing the original<br />

multilayered vegetation structure into fewer layers, altering species richness and<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!