towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation
towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation
towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
48 • Appendix 1<br />
Arunachal). A considerable amount of as yet unsurveyed high-altitude areas in between these PAs<br />
would also get included under this programme.<br />
1. Constraints Faced by Forest Department Staff in Effectively Managing Wildlife in the High<br />
Altitudes (> 3000 M) of Arunachal Pradesh<br />
1.1. Administrative Constraints<br />
1.1.1. Need for expanded mandate for territorial and other departments in biodiversity<br />
conservation: The work of the Territorial Wings of the Forest Department at times<br />
conflicts with the interests of biodiversity conservation. There is a clear need under<br />
the PSL for including wildlife conservation as a priority mandate for the territorial<br />
and other wings of the forest department.<br />
1.1.2. Need for training and capacity development in wildlife management for all Forest<br />
Department officers: The Forest Department has primary control over most areas rich<br />
in biodiversity. Biodiversity conservation often is a specialized task involving skills<br />
in assessing and monitoring biodiversity values, working with communities that<br />
require capacity building. Capacity development of the entire forest department staff<br />
is needed in this regard, including staff serving outside protected areas, as they often<br />
deal with endangered species or human-wildlife conflicts.<br />
1.1.3. Need for posting wildlife trained staff in wildlife departments: As discussed above, there<br />
is a critical need for trained officers to be in charge of the existing Wildlife PAs.<br />
Although the extent of experience and hands-on wildlife management work is vital,<br />
some formal training in Wildlife Management needs to be promoted for all officers<br />
under the PSL.<br />
1.1.4. Intelligence gathering for wildlife offences: no powers with Forest officers, system similar<br />
to that of secret service, police: The police have a system whereby a certain amount is<br />
made available to officers as part of the secret service, which is used to pay informers;<br />
this money is not subject to audit. Such a system is quite effective, but no such<br />
mechanism is as yet available with the Forest Department.<br />
1.1.5. Arms & ammunition-no immunity for forest staff as yet, hampers law enforcement:<br />
The Forest Department usually does not have the required amount of arms and<br />
ammunition; further, whatever is there, is mostly outdated. In areas with serious<br />
poaching problems, this is a major constraint. A related constraint is that the staff is<br />
not trained in handling arms and procedures for legal protection.<br />
1.2. Financial Constraints<br />
1.2.1. Lack of incentives and infrastructure for the staff: The regions are remote, with difficult<br />
working conditions. The problem is exacerbated due to the general lack of proper<br />
infrastructure including adequate housing, equipment and transport. As a result