28.10.2014 Views

towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation

towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation

towards project snow leopard - Nature Conservation Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70 • Appendix 1<br />

1. Constraints Faced by the Forest Department Staff in Effectively Managing Wildlife in the<br />

High Altitudes (> 3000 M) of Uttaranchal<br />

1.1. Constraints: Administrative<br />

1.1.1. Lack of co-ordination among multiple agencies potentially working at cross-purposes:<br />

Wildlife conservation is essentially an integrated activity whereby a substantial part<br />

deals with environment-friendly rural development. The Wildlife Department is<br />

often seen as an ‘anti development’ department. The other higher revenue generating<br />

and development oriented departments sometimes work at cross purposes with the<br />

wildlife department that result in conflict.<br />

1.1.2. Lack of training: The high altitude areas need specialized skills for wildlife monitoring<br />

and management planning. While scientists are experimenting with better techniques<br />

these are not getting transferred to the field personnel on a continuing basis.<br />

1.1.3. Need for management plans/strategies within and outside PAs also: Management<br />

plans provide a scientific basis of working in an area and a vision for that work<br />

over a period of time. These plans are often lacking for the PAs of the region. It<br />

is recognized that besides the PAs we need to also include non-PA areas that have<br />

wildlife value under suitable activities that conserve biodiversity there. There is a lack<br />

of specific prescriptions for wildlife protection/ conservation outside PAs such as the<br />

Overlapping Circles. In this regard, management plans for larger landscapes need to<br />

be prepared.<br />

1.1.4. Lack of stand-by protection mechanisms in the high altitudes: In poaching prone areas<br />

the handful of departmental staff may not be very effective in curbing poaching. A<br />

stand-by protection force has been very effective in this regard in some existing PAs<br />

such as the Corbett Tiger Reserve and NP. A similar mechanism is lacking in the high<br />

altitudes.<br />

1.1.5. Lack of good communication equipment (effective wireless systems): With a difficult and<br />

vast landscape, it is important to have good communication facilities such as wireless<br />

sets and basic roads/trails for staff for their patrolling activities and commuting.<br />

1.1.6. Inadequate demarcation, zonation of PAs, PA boundaries; need for ecologically meaningful<br />

demarcation: There are some PAs of the high altitudes that are very large, but include<br />

substantial areas under permanent glaciers and cliffs with limited wildlife values,<br />

while other smaller pockets with high biodiversity value may still remain outside.<br />

1.2. Constraints: Financial<br />

1.2.1. Inadequate staff strength in high altitudes: The high altitude areas are invariably<br />

inhospitable, and thus there are few staff members who are willing to work there.<br />

Further, there are few posts in these areas per unit area compared with many low<br />

lying PAs. This discrepancy means that there are very large and unmanageable areas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!