Participatory Evaluation of our 2008 - Action Against Hunger

Appendices
A. Seasonal Calendar.......................................................................................................................................45
B. Seed Flow Diagram (groundnut) ..................................................................................................................46
C. Matrix Scoring Experiment for Enterprise Selection ....................................................................................47
D. Programme Tools for Targeting and Timing ................................................................................................48
E. Evaluation Methodology Diagram ................................................................................................................49
F. Evaluation TOR ............................................................................................................................................50
G. Field Tools ...................................................................................................................................................53
H. Fieldwork Images.........................................................................................................................................59
Figures
FIGURE 1. ACF 2008 FFS SITES JUXTAPOSED WITH OTHER ACF PROGRAMME LOCATIONS IN 2007 AND 2008 ........ 12
FIGURE 2. SUMMARY OF FARMER FIELD SCHOOL CORE PRINCIPLES .............................................................................. 14
FIGURE 3. SUMMARY OF FFS GROUPS, ENTERPRISES, AND LOCATIONS ....................................................................... 15
FIGURE 4. ACF FARMER FIELD SCHOOL EVALUATION FRAMEWORK (APRIL 2009) ........................................................ 19
FIGURE 5. COMPARISON OF PREFERRED AND ACTUAL GROUP MEETING TIMES ............................................................. 21
FIGURE 6. SUMMARY OF THE GENDER DIVISION OF LABOUR IN AGRICULTURE............................................................... 22
FIGURE 7. COMPARISON OF ACTUAL AND POTENTIAL GROUNDNUT STUDY PLOT LAYOUTS ........................................... 23
FIGURE 8. PLANTING PRACTICES OF PROGRAMME PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROL GROUP ............................................. 25
FIGURE 9. COMPARISON OF HOUSEHOLD RECORD KEEPING AND QUALITY .................................................................... 25
FIGURE 10. COMPARISON OF A HEALTHY CASSAVA PLANT AND ONE INFECTED WITH CMV .......................................... 28
FIGURE 11. AMOUNT REMAINING IN GROUP BANK ACCOUNT 8 MONTHS AFTER PROGRAMME CLOSURE ....................... 31
FIGURE 12. COMPARED UTILISATION OF COMMERCIAL AND STUDY PLOT PROFITS ........................................................ 32
FIGURE 13. HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL SITUATION AND ACCESS TO CREDIT....................................................................... 32
FIGURE 14. SUMMARY OF THE HOUSEHOLD ECONOMY................................................................................................... 33
FIGURE 15. AVERAGE NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK PER HOUSEHOLD ................................................................................... 34
FIGURE 16. SUMMARY OF ADDITIONAL PHYSICAL ASSETS RESULTING FROM THE FFS PROGRAMME ........................... 34
FIGURE 17. COMPARISON OF HOUSEHOLD DIETARY DIVERSITY SCORES ....................................................................... 35
FIGURE 18. MONTHS WITH INADEQUATE HOUSEHOLD FOOD PROVISIONING .................................................................. 36
FIGURE 19. COMPUTATION AND COMPARISON OF MIHFP SCORES ............................................................................... 36
FIGURE 20. FREQUENCY OF COPING STRATEGY USE IN ACF FFS PROGRAMME AREAS............................................... 37
FIGURE 21. RELATIVE SEVERITY OF COPING STRATEGIES .............................................................................................. 37
FIGURE 22. RANGES OF COPING STRATEGY INDEX ......................................................................................................... 38
FIGURE 23. SOURCES OF SKILL FOR AGRONOMIC PRACTICES AMONG ACF FFS MEMBERS......................................... 38
FIGURE 24. COMPARISON OF FEMALE AND MALE FFS MEMBERS AND COMMITTEE ROLES............................................ 40
FIGURE 25. COMPARISON OF GENDER ROLE DISCREPANCIES IN FFS COMMITTEES ..................................................... 40
FIGURE 26. WEALTH GROUP ANALYSIS OF FFS MEMBERS AND COMMITTEES ............................................................... 44
Action Against Hunger Uganda - 4 - Farmer Field School Evaluation