Participatory Evaluation of our 2008 - Action Against Hunger

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix D. Programme Tools for Targeting and Timing These are two of several possible tools that can be used for future programme targeting and planning. The first was developed in 2009 for cash transfer programme geographic targeting based on a range of complementary criteria, and represented an innovative step forward departmental integration. The second chart summarises admissions of children under five years old in the ACF feeding centres operational around each of the FFS areas. Such data are a first step in completing the preceding table for integrated targeting. More broadly, the trend line of nutrition admissions can provide an interesting counterpoint to trend lines for market prices of key commodities and months without inadequate household food provisioning. Analysing the relationship (or lack) between these three trends might offer increased insight into seasonal shocks, which in turn could suggest possible impact indicators or the timing of certain activities (such as when cash grants should be dispersed to support households without undermining local markets). ACF FSL targeting tool for 2009 Otuke (Lango) livelihood recovery programme Sub- County Parish Villages Population # of Children Under 5 # of Nutrition Admissions % of Children < 5 Admitted WASH 2009 FSL 2008 FSL 2009 ACF feeding centre admissions of children under 5 (2007-2008) Admissions of Children < 5 Years 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Source: ACF Jan 07 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan 08 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Minakulu Girls Minakulu Boys Ngai Girls Ngai Boys Okwang Girls Okwang Boys Adwari Girls Adwari Boys TREND Action Against Hunger Uganda - 48 - Farmer Field School Evaluation
Appendix E. Evaluation Methodology Diagram ACF Programme Documents & Data (2008) Secondary Data FAO Evaluation Data (2008) Secondary Literature and Data ACF Farmer Field School Evaluation (April 2009) • Analysis • Findings • Recommendations Primary Data Targeting and social stratification (wealth ranking) Household food, income, expenditure (proportional piling) Targeting and social stratification (wealth ranking) Household food, income, expenditure (proportional piling) Focus Group Discussion Guide Focus Group Discussion Guide Coping strategies (pairwise ranking) Seasonality (calendar) Coping strategies (pairwise ranking) Seasonality (calendar) Opejal Targeting and social stratification (wealth ranking) Household food, income, expenditure (proportional piling) Oyoro Focus Group Discussion Guide Coping strategies (pairwise ranking) Seasonality (calendar) Aceno Action Against Hunger Uganda - 49 - Farmer Field School Evaluation
Page 1 and 2: Participatory Evaluation of the 200
Page 3 and 4: Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........
Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary A. Synthesis This
Page 7 and 8: 24. FAO cannot be relied upon for s
Page 9 and 10: 10. FFS group meeting locations cou
Page 11 and 12: purchasing of their harvest. Anothe
Page 13 and 14: 1. Background 1.1 ACF and the Lango
Page 15 and 16: Figure 3. Summary of FFS groups, en
Page 17 and 18: new data collected and instead to t
Page 19 and 20: In the absence of a logframe for th
Page 21 and 22: of participants could be the ones a
Page 23 and 24: Figure 7. Comparison of actual and
Page 25 and 26: Figure 8. Planting practices of pro
Page 27 and 28: group members. Such benefits may ac
Page 29 and 30: indications of positive FFS perform
Page 31 and 32: Figure 11. Amount remaining in grou
Page 33 and 34: might simply reflect the effect of
Page 35 and 36: Although these additional household
Page 37 and 38: 4.6 Improvement in participant copi
Page 39 and 40: they report that 97 percent of resp
Page 41 and 42: facilitators on improved production
Page 43 and 44: groups in the area, about which man
Page 45 and 46: Appendix A. Seasonal and programmat
Page 47: Appendix C. Matrix Scoring Experime
Page 51 and 52: Institutional • FFS shorten the t
Page 53 and 54: Appendix G. Field Tools Farmer Fiel
Page 55 and 56: 6. Enhanced income generation and m
Page 57 and 58: Coping Strategies Location: _______

Participatory Evaluation of our 2008 - Action Against Hunger

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?