Participatory Evaluation of our 2008 - Action Against Hunger

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Location: _______________________ Date: ______________ FFS group new? o Yes o No Preferred FEMALE meeting time: _______________________ Preferred MALE meeting time: _______________________ At what time of day did group routinely meet? ________________________ Representation (female/male): Chair _______ Secretary _______ Treasurer _______ Market Coord _______ Mobiliser _______ Network Rep _______ How was profit from study enterprise used? o To expand enterprise o To start another enterprise o Distributed to members o Deposited in the group account o To buy inputs and distribute to members o Other: ________________________________________________________ How was profit from commercial enterprise used? o To expand enterprise o To start another enterprise o Distributed to members o Deposited in the group account o To buy inputs and distribute to members o Other: ________________________________________________________ Is the group bank account still open? o Yes o No If yes, what is the current balance? Ugx _______________ Action Against Hunger Uganda - 56 - Farmer Field School Evaluation
Coping Strategies Location: _______________________ Date: ______________ A. Rely on less preferred, less expensive food B. Borrow food from friend or relative C. Purchase food on credit A. Rely on less preferred, less expensive food B. Borrow food from friend or relative C. Purchase food on credit D. Consume wild foods and animals E. Reduce the portion size of meals F. Reduce the number of meals per day G. Skip entire days without meals D. Consume wild foods and animals E. Reduce the portion size of meals F. Reduce the number of meals per day G. Skip entire days without meals SCORE RANK Action Against Hunger Uganda - 57 - Farmer Field School Evaluation
Page 1 and 2:
Participatory Evaluation of the 200
Page 3 and 4:
Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........
Page 5 and 6: Executive Summary A. Synthesis This
Page 7 and 8: 24. FAO cannot be relied upon for s
Page 9 and 10: 10. FFS group meeting locations cou
Page 11 and 12: purchasing of their harvest. Anothe
Page 13 and 14: 1. Background 1.1 ACF and the Lango
Page 15 and 16: Figure 3. Summary of FFS groups, en
Page 17 and 18: new data collected and instead to t
Page 19 and 20: In the absence of a logframe for th
Page 21 and 22: of participants could be the ones a
Page 23 and 24: Figure 7. Comparison of actual and
Page 25 and 26: Figure 8. Planting practices of pro
Page 27 and 28: group members. Such benefits may ac
Page 29 and 30: indications of positive FFS perform
Page 31 and 32: Figure 11. Amount remaining in grou
Page 33 and 34: might simply reflect the effect of
Page 35 and 36: Although these additional household
Page 37 and 38: 4.6 Improvement in participant copi
Page 39 and 40: they report that 97 percent of resp
Page 41 and 42: facilitators on improved production
Page 43 and 44: groups in the area, about which man
Page 45 and 46: Appendix A. Seasonal and programmat
Page 47 and 48: Appendix C. Matrix Scoring Experime
Page 49 and 50: Appendix E. Evaluation Methodology
Page 51 and 52: Institutional • FFS shorten the t
Page 53 and 54: Appendix G. Field Tools Farmer Fiel
Page 55: 6. Enhanced income generation and m
show all

Participatory Evaluation of our 2008 - Action Against Hunger

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?