15.11.2014 Views

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Detailed <strong>Flood</strong> Reduction <strong>Study</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peterborough</strong><br />

4.7 FLOOD DAMAGE ESTIMATION<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the factors considered in deciding whether to proceed with flood protection<br />

measures for flood vulnerable areas is the economics <strong>of</strong> the project. Generally, a<br />

benefit-cost analysis is completed to evaluate whether the dollar value flood damages<br />

prevented by flood protection exceeds the capital and operating costs <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

Many other factors must be considered such as environmental issues and social issues<br />

but the benefit-cost relationship is generally an important decision factor.<br />

To estimate the benefit side <strong>of</strong> the “equation,” a method <strong>of</strong> assessing the dollar value <strong>of</strong><br />

flood damages must be identified and applied. The result is generally a value known as<br />

the Present Value (PV) <strong>of</strong> the average annual flood damages (AAFD). It can be<br />

directly compared with the sum <strong>of</strong> the capital cost and present worth <strong>of</strong><br />

operation/maintenance <strong>of</strong> any protection works. The approach used to estimate the PV<br />

<strong>of</strong> the AAFD is generally as follows:<br />

1. The extent <strong>of</strong> flooding is identified for different return periods (e.g. 1 in 2 year,<br />

1 in 5 year, 1 in 10 year, 1 in 25 year, 1 in 50 year and 1 in 100 year).<br />

2. Any assets affected by the flooding are identified for each return period and an<br />

estimate <strong>of</strong> the $ damages which each would suffer under those conditions is<br />

assessed. Generally more assets will be affected by larger events. Hence the $<br />

damages will increase with the return period <strong>of</strong> the event.<br />

3. The AAFD is calculated by weighting the estimated damage for each return<br />

period by its probability <strong>of</strong> occurrence, e.g. using the six return periods noted<br />

above, the AAFD would be:<br />

AAFD = 0.5 * D2 + 0.2 * D5 + 0.1 * D10 + 0.04 * D25 + 0.02 * D50 + 0.01 * D100<br />

where Dn is the $ damage associated with the return period n<br />

and the weighting factors 0.5, 0.2, etc. are the inverse <strong>of</strong> the return<br />

period, e.g. 1/2, 1/5, 1/10, etc.<br />

4. The present value is calculated using an accounting formula which converts an<br />

infinite stream <strong>of</strong> annual values to a present worth using a discount factor.<br />

It is worth noting that in calculating the AAFD, less frequent events have relatively<br />

little impact on the total since their weighting is so small compared to more frequent<br />

events. For example, any damages occurring for a 100 year storm have one 50 th <strong>of</strong> the<br />

weight for damages from a 2 year event. This means that it is not necessary to evaluate<br />

14-06605-01-W01 <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peterborough</strong> 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!