15.11.2014 Views

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

Thompson Creek Flood Study Report - City of Peterborough

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> Detailed <strong>Flood</strong> Reduction <strong>Study</strong><br />

<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peterborough</strong><br />

Table 4.5.2<br />

Peak Flows for <strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> for 6 Hour AES Return Period Storms<br />

Location<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Peak Run<strong>of</strong>f Rate (m 3 /s)<br />

2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year<br />

#1 (<strong>Thompson</strong> Dam) 0 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100<br />

#2 (Pond Outlet) 11.15 0.168 0.219 0.267 0.315 0.385 0.426<br />

#3 (Proposed Crossing) 38.32 0.333 0.490 0.630 0.813 1.044 1.170<br />

#4 (Armour Road) 48.72 0.430 0.657 0.831 1.055 1.365 1.526<br />

#5 (Otonabee River) 66.32 0.620 0.954 1.227 1.517 1.917 2.156<br />

Table 4.5.3 shows the peak flows at the same locations for the one hour AES storm .<br />

Table 4.5.3<br />

Peak Flows for <strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> for 1 Hour AES Return Period Storms<br />

Location<br />

Area<br />

(ha)<br />

Peak Run<strong>of</strong>f Rate (m 3 /s)<br />

2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year<br />

#1 (<strong>Thompson</strong> Dam) 0 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100 0.100<br />

#2 (Pond Outlet) 11.15 0.173 0.255 0.334 0.424 0.514 0.588<br />

#3 (Proposed Crossing) 38.32 0.301 0.504 0.697 0.930 1.201 1.414<br />

#4 (Armour Road) 48.72 0.363 0.633 0.915 1.194 1.547 1.824<br />

#5 (Otonabee River) 66.32 0.699 1.137 1.530 1.973 2.372 2.721<br />

As indicated by the tables, the one hour distribution generates the highest peak flow at<br />

all locations for all return periods. Hence these flows (as indicated in Table 4.5.3) were<br />

adopted as the “design flows” for the return period events for <strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong>.<br />

Detailed simulation outputs from Visual OTTHYMO are included in Appendix H.<br />

The calculated peak flows were input to the HEC-RAS model <strong>of</strong> <strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> to<br />

calculate the corresponding water levels. Table 4.5.4 shows the water levels for the 1 in<br />

100 year storm. Mapping <strong>of</strong> the corresponding flood line is described in Section 4.6.1.<br />

Water levels for the 1 in 2 year to 1 in 50 year storms (which are all less than those<br />

indicated in Table 4.5.4) are presented in Appendix I with the HEC-RAS outputs.<br />

4.5.2.2 Volume Events for <strong>Flood</strong> Vulnerability Mapping<br />

Table 4.5.5 shows the calculated peak flows for <strong>Thompson</strong> <strong>Creek</strong> for future land use<br />

conditions (described in Section 4.4.1.1) for the six volume based events required by<br />

the Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference. Flows are indicated for the one hour AES storms at the<br />

locations on the creek indicated on Figure 4.4.2. The one hour storm was found to give<br />

the highest set <strong>of</strong> peak flows. A comparison between Tables 4.5.3 and 4.5.5 shows that<br />

the peak flows from this set <strong>of</strong> events exceed the 1 in 100 year peak flow for all storm<br />

with a volume <strong>of</strong> 60 mm or more and that the 120 mm storm generates peak flows<br />

14-06605-01-W01 <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Peterborough</strong> 59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!