22.11.2014 Views

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If the co-op’s earnings are not distributed to the member in cash,<br />

they are distributed with allocated equity, each dollar of equity being<br />

identified with a member on the basis of the member’s proportional<br />

use. Each dollar of allocated equity that is eventually redeemed is<br />

redeemed at no more than its face value. But in the meantime, until<br />

the allocated equity is redeemed, it does not appreciate in value. In<br />

fact, the longer the co-op uses <strong>and</strong> holds the equity, the more the<br />

equity is depreciated from the effect of the time value of money.<br />

But as soon as the co-op has surplus working capital, allocated equity<br />

is redeemed <strong>and</strong> returned to members. The co-op is motivated to<br />

distribute surplus working capital rather than reinvest it in the co-op<br />

because aggr<strong>and</strong>izing itself over its members benefits no one <strong>and</strong> is<br />

counter to the philosophy under which the co-op is formed. The<br />

board of directors is motivated to distribute surplus working capital<br />

through equity redemptions because each director—like every other<br />

member—eventually wants that surplus capital if <strong>and</strong> when the<br />

co-op can afford to return it.<br />

This same dynamic does not exist in an IOF, because the principles<br />

of subordination of capital, service at cost, <strong>and</strong> co-op agency theory<br />

are not in play. Obviously some investors desire dividends, while<br />

others desire retention of earnings <strong>and</strong> appreciation in the value of<br />

their holdings. But the IOF decides what to do with its earnings by<br />

reference to their impact on the IOF’s value, not, as a co-op does,<br />

by reference to the extent that the co-op integrates <strong>and</strong> adds value to<br />

members’ lives or businesses. An IOF is a supplier to customers, not<br />

an agent of its members or an extension of their lives or businesses.<br />

Finally, consider that an IOF’s universe of investors is narrow, limited<br />

by the number of shares of common stock the IOF has issued.<br />

Hence, the number of claims on earnings is finite. A finite number<br />

of shares means that as the value of the business increases, the same<br />

number of shares is now more valuable than before the increase in<br />

the value of the business.<br />

By comparison, an open membership co-op’s universe of members<br />

is dynamic <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong>ing all the time. The number of claims on<br />

earnings in an open membership cooperative is infinite, limited<br />

only by the number of co-op members <strong>and</strong> their proportion of the<br />

business of all members combined. Because at the co-op’s dissolution<br />

the remaining proceeds are distributed on the basis of historical<br />

patronage to present <strong>and</strong> former members, the longer that an open<br />

membership is in business before dissolution, the more claims that<br />

are created from present <strong>and</strong> former members who are entitled to a<br />

portion of the remaining proceeds at the co-op’s dissolution.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!