22.11.2014 Views

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We encourage you to have your credit union’s articles of incorporation<br />

<strong>and</strong> bylaws reviewed by legal counsel for the specific purpose of<br />

learning whether your credit union might be prohibited from paying<br />

a patronage refund. Our concern arises from the fact that at dissolution,<br />

credit union statutes appear to favor share ownership over<br />

historical patronage.<br />

If the owners of shares in the credit union are the beneficiaries of the<br />

remaining proceeds in dissolution, the question arises whether they<br />

could object to any payment that is not paid on the basis of ownership<br />

while the credit union is operating. We recommend that you<br />

discuss with your legal counsel whether your credit union should<br />

amend its articles <strong>and</strong> bylaws to specifically allow payments of<br />

patronage refunds on a patronage basis any time prior to a dissolution<br />

vote.<br />

Future Tax Considerations<br />

Nothing on the horizon points to any modification of the federal tax<br />

exemptions that apply to federal or state- chartered credit unions. In<br />

this section, we consider two alternatives: (1) that credit unions are<br />

taxed under Subchapter T <strong>and</strong> (2) an argument for why 501(c)(14)<br />

<strong>and</strong> 501(c)(1) tax statutes will not be touched.<br />

The Case for Subchapter T<br />

From time to time, the General Accounting Office (GAO) prepares<br />

reports on tax- exempt business entities. In 2005, the GAO prepared<br />

a report on credit unions that, aside from reciting the arguments for<br />

<strong>and</strong> against the tax exemption, contained no recommendations for or<br />

against the tax exemption.<br />

In 1983, the GAO issued a report recommending that Congress<br />

consider taxing rural electric cooperatives under Subchapter T. The<br />

recommendation was not adopted by Congress, but in this section<br />

we consider what would happen if the GAO made the same recommendation<br />

for taxation of credit unions. Assuming that Congress<br />

acted on the GAO recommendation this time, we apply Subchapter<br />

T to the 27 credit unions in the Callahan study.<br />

Figure 6, a modification of Figure 1, shows these 27 credit unions<br />

under 501(c)(14) <strong>and</strong> then compares this with two scenarios under<br />

Subchapter T. One scenario shows these credit unions allocating<br />

40% of patronage- sourced income (<strong>and</strong> paying a cash patronage<br />

refund of 20% of the total allocated) <strong>and</strong> paying taxes (federal <strong>and</strong><br />

state) on the other 60%. The other scenario shows these credit<br />

unions allocating 100% of patronage- sourced income <strong>and</strong> paying no<br />

income tax.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!