Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...
Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...
Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Badgerl<strong>and</strong>, all of this association’s equity is unallocated except for<br />
approximately $8.0M of common stock. Its net income has nearly<br />
doubled in the last five years.<br />
This association is stronger than either Badgerl<strong>and</strong> or AgGeorgia. At<br />
its 2009 fiscal year end, its core surplus ratio was under 14%, <strong>and</strong> it<br />
grew stronger in 2010 when the ratio reached 16%. Obviously this<br />
association—which we agreed to leave unnamed—is in a position<br />
to pay a patronage refund if the board approves it. The association’s<br />
chief financial officer summarized the debate as follows.<br />
Those Arguing “No <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund”<br />
A portion of this association’s board of directors takes the position<br />
that it operates on a cooperative basis every day even though the<br />
association does not pay a patronage refund. These directors say that<br />
the very existence of the association acts as a competitive force to<br />
keep other lending institutions’ rates comparable to the association’s<br />
rates <strong>and</strong> cost of services. That being true, these directors are not<br />
in favor of paying a patronage refund. Members, they would argue,<br />
already receive a patronage refund.<br />
These directors also contend that it is unnecessary to charge higher<br />
interest rates or prices for services only to return some of those earnings<br />
in cash as a patronage refund. Obviously the association’s growth<br />
is strong <strong>and</strong> it appears unnecessary to prime it further. In fact, no<br />
one on the board of directors takes the view that a patronage refund<br />
would improve the association’s rate of growth.<br />
Those Arguing “Pay a <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund”<br />
On the other side is a portion of directors who are in favor of paying<br />
a patronage refund. These directors’ position is that co-ops are<br />
supposed to pay a patronage refund. These directors also believe<br />
that paying a patronage refund ties members more closely with, <strong>and</strong><br />
deepens their loyalty to, the association.<br />
If Paid, Pay <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund in Cash; No Allocated<br />
Equity<br />
If there is a consensus within the board of directors, it is that a<br />
patronage refund, if paid, should be entirely cash. All of the directors<br />
are farmers <strong>and</strong> hence very familiar with agricultural cooperatives.<br />
These directors do not like the idea of receiving an allocation of<br />
patronage refunds but not receiving a large enough cash patronage<br />
refund to pay the income taxes those members will owe state <strong>and</strong><br />
federal governments on that patronage income. 30<br />
38