22.11.2014 Views

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Badgerl<strong>and</strong>, all of this association’s equity is unallocated except for<br />

approximately $8.0M of common stock. Its net income has nearly<br />

doubled in the last five years.<br />

This association is stronger than either Badgerl<strong>and</strong> or AgGeorgia. At<br />

its 2009 fiscal year end, its core surplus ratio was under 14%, <strong>and</strong> it<br />

grew stronger in 2010 when the ratio reached 16%. Obviously this<br />

association—which we agreed to leave unnamed—is in a position<br />

to pay a patronage refund if the board approves it. The association’s<br />

chief financial officer summarized the debate as follows.<br />

Those Arguing “No <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund”<br />

A portion of this association’s board of directors takes the position<br />

that it operates on a cooperative basis every day even though the<br />

association does not pay a patronage refund. These directors say that<br />

the very existence of the association acts as a competitive force to<br />

keep other lending institutions’ rates comparable to the association’s<br />

rates <strong>and</strong> cost of services. That being true, these directors are not<br />

in favor of paying a patronage refund. Members, they would argue,<br />

already receive a patronage refund.<br />

These directors also contend that it is unnecessary to charge higher<br />

interest rates or prices for services only to return some of those earnings<br />

in cash as a patronage refund. Obviously the association’s growth<br />

is strong <strong>and</strong> it appears unnecessary to prime it further. In fact, no<br />

one on the board of directors takes the view that a patronage refund<br />

would improve the association’s rate of growth.<br />

Those Arguing “Pay a <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund”<br />

On the other side is a portion of directors who are in favor of paying<br />

a patronage refund. These directors’ position is that co-ops are<br />

supposed to pay a patronage refund. These directors also believe<br />

that paying a patronage refund ties members more closely with, <strong>and</strong><br />

deepens their loyalty to, the association.<br />

If Paid, Pay <strong>Patronage</strong> Refund in Cash; No Allocated<br />

Equity<br />

If there is a consensus within the board of directors, it is that a<br />

patronage refund, if paid, should be entirely cash. All of the directors<br />

are farmers <strong>and</strong> hence very familiar with agricultural cooperatives.<br />

These directors do not like the idea of receiving an allocation of<br />

patronage refunds but not receiving a large enough cash patronage<br />

refund to pay the income taxes those members will owe state <strong>and</strong><br />

federal governments on that patronage income. 30<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!