22.11.2014 Views

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

Credit Union and Cooperative Patronage Refunds - Filene ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

As we visited with Hanson, it was difficult to ignore the institutional<br />

tone that is created from paying a patronage refund to members.<br />

<strong>Patronage</strong> refunds championed by the board <strong>and</strong> management make<br />

member ownership feel more real for members. Hanson emphasized<br />

that, aside from the issue of being accountable to members, the<br />

important thing to note is that patronage refunds are a differentiator<br />

<strong>and</strong> distinguish the credit union from IOF firms.<br />

Wright-Patt <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Union</strong>, Inc.<br />

Our conversation with Tim Mislansky, senior vice president <strong>and</strong><br />

chief lending officer, may have been the most exciting because the<br />

payment of patronage refunds is a relatively new practice at Wright-<br />

Patt <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Union</strong>, Inc. Mislansky told us that patronage refunds<br />

were not necessarily top of mind at Wright-Patt until its management<br />

determined that they were a mechanism for managing the<br />

credit union’s capital growth.<br />

Management had been trying to control the credit union’s growth in<br />

capital by lowering service fees <strong>and</strong> other rates. But as fees <strong>and</strong> rates<br />

were lowered, the credit union’s capital <strong>and</strong> its success continued to<br />

grow, which prompted some directors to tease whether management<br />

had solved Wright-Patt’s issue of excess capital.<br />

Wright-Patt management requested that Callahan consultants<br />

provide information about patronage refunds for management’s<br />

consideration. Management had already developed a sophisticated<br />

stakeholder model including (1) members, (2) employees, <strong>and</strong><br />

(3) the <strong>Credit</strong> <strong>Union</strong>. Management proposed that Wright-Patt dovetail<br />

patronage refunds into its stakeholder model, <strong>and</strong> the Board of<br />

Directors reviewed <strong>and</strong> adopted management’s recommendation.<br />

Wright-Patt is not identified in the Callahan 27 credit unions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Mislansky brought to our attention that not all credit unions<br />

separately account for patronage refunds from dividends in the call<br />

reports that are submitted to the NCUA. Wright-Patt reports its<br />

patronage refund with the dividends it pays on shares.<br />

Wright-Patt is located in Fairborn, Ohio, <strong>and</strong> operates 24 branch<br />

offices. As of December 31, 2010, Wright-Patt had over 202,320<br />

members (15% of potential members), 428 full-time employees,<br />

total assets of nearly $2.0B, <strong>and</strong> total loan volume of $1.12B. Membership<br />

grew by 8.59% in 2010. Douglas Fecher is Wright-Patt’s<br />

chief executive officer.<br />

Wright-Patt’s average annual cash patronage refund over the last<br />

three years was $3,751,478, <strong>and</strong> its earnings (including the refund)<br />

averaged $19,867,464 during that time. So over the past three years,<br />

Wright-Patt has paid an average of 18.88% of its earnings in cash on<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!