Promoting Business Process Management Excellence in Russia
Promoting Business Process Management Excellence in Russia
Promoting Business Process Management Excellence in Russia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
84<br />
world) and not only data-centric (virtual world). Amaz<strong>in</strong>gly, until the doctoral thesis of Matthias<br />
Fischer (M. Fischer, 2012), it did not succeed <strong>in</strong> all the years to develop a similar model for the<br />
field of real-world processes on a purely logical basis, similar to the relational model by Ted Codd<br />
(1923-2003) <strong>in</strong> the field of data. These processes can be organized <strong>in</strong>to a directed flow of elusive<br />
events.<br />
A process is accord<strong>in</strong>g to a def<strong>in</strong>ition of Mart<strong>in</strong> Carrier and Re<strong>in</strong>er Wimmer (Mittelstraß, 1995),<br />
“the directed flow of an occurrence” and be composed of events. Figure 25 represents the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
of the event based regulation and execution of processes. Regulation events could roughly<br />
be divided up <strong>in</strong>to the two groups of <strong>in</strong>itial and observ<strong>in</strong>g events. On the other hand, execution<br />
events could be suitable subdivided accord<strong>in</strong>g to the degree of their <strong>in</strong>terference or predeterm<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
(model<strong>in</strong>g), for example. The solar flares can probably be predeterm<strong>in</strong>ed still less exactly<br />
today as for example the meticulous plann<strong>in</strong>g and carry<strong>in</strong>g out of an airport or a railroad station.<br />
Regulation Events<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g<br />
observ<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Execution Events<br />
Figure 25: Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of an event-driven application system<br />
The event schema, with which a k<strong>in</strong>d of logical w<strong>in</strong>dow is opened to the real world (universe),<br />
def<strong>in</strong>es Fischer as follows:<br />
S(A) = {A, Z, E, B}<br />
S(A)<br />
A<br />
A<br />
Z<br />
E<br />
B<br />
: event schema<br />
: <strong>in</strong>stances (extension)<br />
: set of preconditions<br />
: set of postconditions<br />
: set of properties and <strong>in</strong>variants<br />
: set of relations (outward <strong>in</strong>tension)<br />
At first Fischer reconstructs language-critically resp. rational-grammatically a general “frame”<br />
(schema) for events. We could describe this strik<strong>in</strong>gly as a k<strong>in</strong>d of “logical wormhole” s<strong>in</strong>ce it still<br />
fits <strong>in</strong> with the logical space- and timelessly as a pure abstraction. The “event-w<strong>in</strong>dow” is then<br />
established model-likely <strong>in</strong> space and time by the further explanations’ established location and<br />
temporal perspective, us<strong>in</strong>g relevant concepts of space and time. That means the frame gets stepby-step<br />
filled with relevant concepts of a universal event description. Via the actor perspective it<br />
then also turns out well, to equip the event before it really takes place systematically with the<br />
substantial concepts (schema pieces) for actors and (work-)means. This <strong>in</strong>tellectual procedure<br />
(method) is used cont<strong>in</strong>uously <strong>in</strong> accordance with Figure 25 both on the regulation and on the<br />
execution layer of our universal application system architecture (Ortner, 2010).<br />
The constructive and language critical reference of the approach can be expressed as follows by<br />
analogy with (Kamlah & Lorenzen, 1996):<br />
“By an elusive, s<strong>in</strong>gular event be<strong>in</strong>g brought about to a (language logical) schema agreed on, it is available (e.g. for<br />
the renewed execution of such events) like a (re-)usable equipment.”<br />
Often one th<strong>in</strong>ks of a soccer match as an example, the events were brought about by model<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a language schema dur<strong>in</strong>g the action (e.g. ball assumptions, referee’s decisions at “bugs” etc.)