Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Signal WS<br />
X 1 0:15<br />
X 2 0:36<br />
X 3 0:53<br />
Table 6: Wavelet entropy for a sinusoidal signal (X 1 ), for a r<strong>and</strong>om signal (X 3 ) <strong>and</strong> for<br />
a sinusoidal signal with noise (X 2 = 1 (X 2 1 + X 3 )).<br />
Statistical <strong>analysis</strong><br />
Statistical <strong>analysis</strong> was performed by computing the mean entropy values in the<br />
second pre- <strong>and</strong> post-stimulus. Signicance <strong>of</strong> entropy decreases were calculated for<br />
each electrode <strong>and</strong> stimuli type by comparing minimum pre- <strong>and</strong> post-stimulation with<br />
t-test comparisons.<br />
6.3.2 Results<br />
The Wavelet entropy (WS) was tested with 3 dierent time series. A: a pure sinusoidal<br />
signal with a <strong>frequency</strong> <strong>of</strong> 12 Hz (X 1 ) B: a r<strong>and</strong>om signal (X 3 ) <strong>and</strong> C: a signal composed<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> the two previous ones (X 2 ). The r<strong>and</strong>om signal was obtained from a white<br />
noise generator. Table 6 shows the results <strong>of</strong> the WS for the three <strong>signals</strong>. As expected,<br />
the WS is higher for the noisy signal (broad-b<strong>and</strong> spectrum) <strong>and</strong> minimum for the<br />
sinusoidal one (narrow-b<strong>and</strong> spectrum).<br />
The event-related responses <strong>of</strong> one typical subject are shown in gure 31. Only the<br />
central <strong>and</strong> left electrodes are shown, having the right ones similar behavior. Left side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the gure corresponds to VEP, center to NON-TARGET <strong>and</strong> right sidetoTARGET<br />
stimuli. The P100 response is clearly visible upon all stimuli types at about 100 ms,<br />
best dened in occipital locations. In the case <strong>of</strong> TARGET stimulation, a marked<br />
positive peak appears between 400 <strong>and</strong> 500 ms, according to the expected cognitive<br />
P300 response.<br />
Figure 32 shows the results <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> total energies for the same subject.<br />
Only the lower <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s are plotted since the higher ones showed no relevant<br />
contribution to the total energy. All stimuli types show alpha <strong>and</strong> theta b<strong>and</strong> increases in<br />
occipital locations at 100-200 ms, correlated with the P100-N200 complex. Only upon<br />
TARGET stimulation an increase in the posterior locations is visualized in the delta<br />
b<strong>and</strong> at 500-600 ms, this increase being related with the cognitive response(P300).<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the WS for the same subject are shown in gure 33. Decreases in the<br />
entropy are more signicant in posterior sites upon TARGET stimulation, strongly<br />
90