27.11.2014 Views

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Signal WS<br />

X 1 0:15<br />

X 2 0:36<br />

X 3 0:53<br />

Table 6: Wavelet entropy for a sinusoidal signal (X 1 ), for a r<strong>and</strong>om signal (X 3 ) <strong>and</strong> for<br />

a sinusoidal signal with noise (X 2 = 1 (X 2 1 + X 3 )).<br />

Statistical <strong>analysis</strong><br />

Statistical <strong>analysis</strong> was performed by computing the mean entropy values in the<br />

second pre- <strong>and</strong> post-stimulus. Signicance <strong>of</strong> entropy decreases were calculated for<br />

each electrode <strong>and</strong> stimuli type by comparing minimum pre- <strong>and</strong> post-stimulation with<br />

t-test comparisons.<br />

6.3.2 Results<br />

The Wavelet entropy (WS) was tested with 3 dierent time series. A: a pure sinusoidal<br />

signal with a <strong>frequency</strong> <strong>of</strong> 12 Hz (X 1 ) B: a r<strong>and</strong>om signal (X 3 ) <strong>and</strong> C: a signal composed<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sum <strong>of</strong> the two previous ones (X 2 ). The r<strong>and</strong>om signal was obtained from a white<br />

noise generator. Table 6 shows the results <strong>of</strong> the WS for the three <strong>signals</strong>. As expected,<br />

the WS is higher for the noisy signal (broad-b<strong>and</strong> spectrum) <strong>and</strong> minimum for the<br />

sinusoidal one (narrow-b<strong>and</strong> spectrum).<br />

The event-related responses <strong>of</strong> one typical subject are shown in gure 31. Only the<br />

central <strong>and</strong> left electrodes are shown, having the right ones similar behavior. Left side<br />

<strong>of</strong> the gure corresponds to VEP, center to NON-TARGET <strong>and</strong> right sidetoTARGET<br />

stimuli. The P100 response is clearly visible upon all stimuli types at about 100 ms,<br />

best dened in occipital locations. In the case <strong>of</strong> TARGET stimulation, a marked<br />

positive peak appears between 400 <strong>and</strong> 500 ms, according to the expected cognitive<br />

P300 response.<br />

Figure 32 shows the results <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> total energies for the same subject.<br />

Only the lower <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s are plotted since the higher ones showed no relevant<br />

contribution to the total energy. All stimuli types show alpha <strong>and</strong> theta b<strong>and</strong> increases in<br />

occipital locations at 100-200 ms, correlated with the P100-N200 complex. Only upon<br />

TARGET stimulation an increase in the posterior locations is visualized in the delta<br />

b<strong>and</strong> at 500-600 ms, this increase being related with the cognitive response(P300).<br />

Results <strong>of</strong> the WS for the same subject are shown in gure 33. Decreases in the<br />

entropy are more signicant in posterior sites upon TARGET stimulation, strongly<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!