27.11.2014 Views

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in this chapter, the question <strong>of</strong> a deterministic or noisy nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>EEG</strong> <strong>signals</strong> keep the<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> many research groups during the last years.<br />

5.2.3 Calculation <strong>of</strong> the Correlation Dimension<br />

I will illustrate briey a proposal made by Grassberger <strong>and</strong> Procaccia (1983) for computing<br />

the correlation dimension D 2 . First <strong>of</strong> all, a phase space must be constructed, this<br />

space being spanned by a set <strong>of</strong> embedding vectors. In the case <strong>of</strong> univariate <strong>signals</strong>, following<br />

a proposal made by Takens (1981) called the \time shift method", n-dimensional<br />

vectors are constructed in the following way:<br />

~x = fx(t)x(t + ):::x(t +(n ; 1) )g (43)<br />

where is a xed time increment <strong>and</strong> n is the embedding dimension. Every instantaneous<br />

state <strong>of</strong> the system is therefore represented by thevector ~x which denes apoint in the<br />

phase-space. Once the phase space is constructed, the correlation integral as a function<br />

<strong>of</strong> variable distances R is dened as:<br />

C(R) = lim<br />

N!1<br />

1 X<br />

(R ;j~x<br />

N 2 i ; ~x j j) (44)<br />

i6=j<br />

where N is the number <strong>of</strong> data points <strong>and</strong> is the Heavyside function. Then C(R)<br />

is a measure <strong>of</strong> the probability that two arbitrary points ~x i , ~x j will be separated by<br />

a distance less than R. Theiler (1986) made a correction to this method in order to<br />

avoid spurious temporal correlations. He proposed that the vectors to be compared<br />

when calculating the correlation integral, should be distanced at least W data points<br />

(ji ; jj >W), where W is a measure <strong>of</strong> the temporal correlation <strong>of</strong> the signal (e.g. the<br />

rst zero <strong>of</strong> the autocorrelation function.)<br />

In the case the attractor is a simple curve in the phase space, the number <strong>of</strong> pair <strong>of</strong><br />

vectors whose distance in less than a certain radius R will be proportional to R 1 . In<br />

the case the attractor is a two dimensional surface, C(R) R 2 <strong>and</strong> for a xed point,<br />

C(R) R 0 . Generalizing we can write the following relation:<br />

C(R) R D 2<br />

(45)<br />

then, if the number <strong>of</strong> data <strong>and</strong> the embedding dimension are suciently large we obtain<br />

D 2 = lim<br />

R!0<br />

log C(R)<br />

log R<br />

The main point isthatC(R) behaves as a power <strong>of</strong> R for small R. By plotting log C(R)<br />

versus log R, D 2 can be calculated from the slope <strong>of</strong> the curve. For an attractor with<br />

70<br />

(46)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!