Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Duke (1992) <strong>and</strong> Elbert et al. (1994) <strong>and</strong> Basar <strong>and</strong> Quian Quiroga (1998).<br />
The Correlation Dimension was also used for characterizing the nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>EEG</strong> <strong>signals</strong>.<br />
In principle, converging D 2 values point towards a non-linear deterministic nature<br />
<strong>and</strong> diverging D 2 values would stress the interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>EEG</strong> <strong>signals</strong> as noise. First<br />
results showed converging values <strong>of</strong> D 2 in several situations. However, Osborne <strong>and</strong><br />
Provenzale (1989) showed that ltered noise can also give nite D 2 values. Pijn et al.<br />
(1991) proposed the use <strong>of</strong> surrogate tests in order to validate the results obtained with<br />
D 2 . In brief, r<strong>and</strong>om (surrogate) <strong>signals</strong> are constructed from the original one with the<br />
same linear characteristics (<strong>frequency</strong> spectrum) <strong>and</strong> then, converging D 2 values <strong>of</strong> the<br />
original signal should be considered valid, only if the ones <strong>of</strong> the surrogates diverge. By<br />
applying this procedure, they found that values <strong>of</strong> the original <strong>and</strong> surrogate data dier<br />
in the case <strong>of</strong> epileptic seizures in the case <strong>of</strong> the normal <strong>EEG</strong>, this <strong>analysis</strong> showing<br />
that it is indistinguishable from Gaussian noise. Achermann et al. (1994a) also reported<br />
no dierences between <strong>EEG</strong> in sleep stages <strong>and</strong> noise.<br />
5.4.2 Lyapunov Exponents<br />
Although the determination <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> a positive Lyapunov exponent could be a<br />
sign<strong>of</strong>chaos, publications about Lyapunov exponents are rare in comparison to the ones<br />
with Correlation Dimension. I will report here some important ndings with Lyapunov<br />
exponents in epilepsy, sleep stages <strong>and</strong> in dierent pathologies.<br />
Epilepsy<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the rst attempts to apply Lyapunov exponents to <strong>EEG</strong> data was done by<br />
Babloyantz <strong>and</strong> Destexhe (1986) using the Wolf method for the evaluation <strong>of</strong> a short<br />
epileptic \Petit Mal" seizure. They obtained a value <strong>of</strong> =2:9 0:6, concluding that<br />
although the attractor has a global stability during an epileptic seizure (due to a very<br />
low Correlation Dimension), the presence <strong>of</strong> a positiveLyapunov exponent shows a great<br />
sensitivity to initial conditions, giving a rich response to external outputs.<br />
Frank et al. (1990) studied a longer \Gr<strong>and</strong> Mal" epileptic seizure. They proposed a<br />
modied version <strong>of</strong> the Wolf method, choosing in a dierent way the replacementvectors<br />
<strong>and</strong> making multiple passes through the time series. They point out that Lyapunov<br />
exponents are sensible to the evolution time <strong>and</strong> to the embedding dimension, reporting<br />
a value <strong>of</strong> =1 0:2 estimated across dierent embedding dimensions.<br />
Iasemidis <strong>and</strong> Sackellares (1991) also used a modied Wolf algorithm <strong>and</strong> analyzed<br />
seizures recorded with subdural electrodes. They observed a drop in the Lyapunov<br />
Exponents during seizures, with greater values (implying a more chaotic state) postictally<br />
than ictally or pre-ictally. Furthermore, they found a phase-locking <strong>of</strong> the focal<br />
77