27.11.2014 Views

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

where k g D k= R 1<br />

;1 jg D(t 0 )j 2 dt 0 . Eq. 18 is the inverse Gabor Transform <strong>and</strong> implies that<br />

the original signal can be completely reconstructed from the coecients G D (f t).<br />

Gabor Transform is highly redundant because it gives a time-<strong>frequency</strong> map from<br />

every time value <strong>of</strong> the original signal. In order to decrease redundancy, asampled Gabor<br />

Transform can be dened by taking discrete values <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong> <strong>frequency</strong>, i.e.:<br />

G D (f t) ! G D (mF nT ) (19)<br />

where F <strong>and</strong> T represent the <strong>frequency</strong> <strong>and</strong> time sampling steps. Small F steps are<br />

obtained by using large windows, <strong>and</strong> small T steps are obtained by using high overlapping<br />

between successive windows. Depending on the resolution required, a proper<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> F <strong>and</strong> T will decrease the redundancy <strong>and</strong> save computational time, but the<br />

price to pay is that the reconstruction will be no longer straightforward as with eq. 18<br />

(Qian <strong>and</strong> Chen, 1996).<br />

In the following, for convenience I will keep the notation <strong>of</strong> the continuous Gabor<br />

Transform dened in eq. 14. The spectrum can be dened as<br />

I(f t) =jG D (f t)j 2 = G D(f t) G D (f t) (20)<br />

<strong>and</strong> a time-<strong>frequency</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> the signal can be obtained by using a recursive<br />

algorithm that slides the time window <strong>and</strong> plots the energy (I) as a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>frequency</strong> <strong>and</strong> time. These plots, called spectrograms (see g. 8), give an elegant visual<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the time evolution <strong>of</strong> the dierent frequencies, but it is dicult to extract<br />

from them any quantitative measure.<br />

In order to quantify this information, I will dene the b<strong>and</strong> power spectral intensity<br />

for each one <strong>of</strong> the <strong>EEG</strong> traditional <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s i (i = :::) as:<br />

I (i) (t) =<br />

Z f<br />

(i) max<br />

f (i) min<br />

I(f t) df i = ::: (21)<br />

where ( f (i) min f (i) max ) are the <strong>frequency</strong> limits for the b<strong>and</strong> i. The division <strong>and</strong> grouping<br />

<strong>of</strong> the spectrum in <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s is not arbitrary, since as showed in section x1.1.1<br />

<strong>and</strong> section x2.3.3, <strong>EEG</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s are correlated with dierent sources <strong>and</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

brain.<br />

Obviously the total power spectral intensity will be<br />

I T (t) = X i<br />

I (i) (t) i = ::: (22)<br />

<strong>and</strong> we can dene the b<strong>and</strong> relative intensity ratio (RIR) foreach <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong> i as<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!