27.11.2014 Views

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

criterion (see sec. x5.2.4). D 2 varied between 4:5 ; 6 without a clear dierence between<br />

normal <strong>and</strong> pathological <strong>EEG</strong> recordings. Maximum Lyapunov exponents were positive<br />

in all the cases giving an evidence <strong>of</strong> chaotic activity (in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>signals</strong> having a<br />

deterministic origin).<br />

5.6 Application to intracranially recorded tonic-clonic seizures<br />

5.6.1 Material <strong>and</strong> Methods<br />

The subject <strong>and</strong> data analyzed was described in sec. x3.3. The <strong>EEG</strong> corresponds to a<br />

9-hour intracranial recording from a 21 years old patient with tonic-clonic seizures.<br />

5.6.2 Results <strong>and</strong> Discussion<br />

Figure 7 shows the <strong>EEG</strong> signal corresponding to a segment <strong>of</strong> 64 sec from one depth<br />

electrode in the left hippocampus. As seen in the gure, the epileptic seizure starts<br />

about second 10 <strong>and</strong> nishes about second 54.<br />

In order to study changes in the <strong>EEG</strong> behavior the signal was divided in intervals <strong>of</strong><br />

8 sec as follows: ( i ) pre-seizure (0 ; 8sec) ( ii ) starting <strong>of</strong> the seizure (10 ; 18sec) (<br />

iii ) full development <strong>of</strong> the seizure (21 ; 29sec) <strong>and</strong> (29 ; 37sec) ( iv ) ending <strong>of</strong> the<br />

seizure (37 ; 44sec) <strong>and</strong> (44 ; 52sec).<br />

For these intervals, stationaritywas tested following the criterion described in sec. x5.3.<br />

The length <strong>of</strong> the bins used was <strong>of</strong> 512 data. In the second interval (10 ; 18sec) the<br />

criterion <strong>of</strong> stationarity was not satised due to the fast changes in the <strong>EEG</strong> morphology.<br />

The time delay <strong>and</strong> the minimum embedding dimension were estimated with the<br />

geometrical method introduced by Rosestein <strong>and</strong> the False Nearest Neighbor method,<br />

respectively (see sect. x5.2.4).<br />

Fig. 29 displays the two dimensional projection <strong>of</strong> the phase portraits for the selected<br />

intervals. Each <strong>EEG</strong> segment was characterized by its Correlation Dimensions <strong>and</strong><br />

maximum Lyapunov exponents.<br />

Table 5 shows the stationary zones, optimal time lags , minimum embedding dimensions,<br />

Correlation Dimension <strong>and</strong> maximum Lyapunov exponent for the dierent<br />

<strong>EEG</strong> intervals. These last two parameters were obtained as an average among the corresponding<br />

values obtained for all the considered embedding dimensions. These values<br />

are in good agreement with those given in the literature in background activity <strong>and</strong> in<br />

epileptic seizures (see sec. x5.4).<br />

The seizure is characterized by a drop in the value <strong>of</strong> the maximum Lyapunov exponent.<br />

A similar situation is observed for the Correlation Dimension. From the values<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!