Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
j (n) = X k<br />
C j (k) jk (n) (35)<br />
is the detail signal at scale j.<br />
Figure 14 shows as an example the multiresolution decomposition method applied<br />
to an event-related potential <strong>and</strong> the corresponding reconstruction achieved by using<br />
the inverse transform. The method starts by correlating the signal with shifted versions<br />
(i.e. thus giving the time evolution) <strong>of</strong> a contracted wavelet function, the coecients<br />
obtained thus giving the detail <strong>of</strong> the high <strong>frequency</strong> components. The remaining part<br />
will be a coarser version <strong>of</strong> the original signal that can be obtained by correlating the<br />
signal with the scaling function, which is orthogonal to the wavelet function. Then, the<br />
wavelet function is dilated <strong>and</strong> from the coarser signal the procedure is repeated, thus<br />
giving a decomposition <strong>of</strong> the signal in dierent scale levels, or what it is analog, in<br />
dierent <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s. This method gives a decomposition <strong>of</strong> the signal that can be<br />
implemented with very ecient algorithms due to the fact that it can be achieved just<br />
by applying simple lters, as showed by Mallat (1989, see table 1 for an example). The<br />
lower levels give the details corresponding to the high <strong>frequency</strong> components <strong>and</strong> the<br />
higher levels the ones corresponding the the low frequencies. As pointed out in sec. x4.1,<br />
the levels related with higher frequencies have more coecients that the lower ones, due<br />
to the varying window size <strong>of</strong> the Wavelet Transform.<br />
4.2.4 B-Splines wavelets<br />
An important point to be discussed is howtochoose the mother functions to be compared<br />
with the signal. In principle, the wavelet function should have a certain shape that we<br />
would like to localize in the original signal. However, due to mathematical restrictions,<br />
not every function can be used as a wavelet. Then, one criterion for choosing the wavelet<br />
function is that \it looks similar" to the patterns <strong>of</strong> the original signal. In this respect,<br />
B-Spline functions seem suitable for decomposing ERPs (see bottom part <strong>of</strong> gure 13).<br />
B-Splines are piecewise polynomial functions <strong>of</strong> a certain degree that form a base in<br />
L 2 (R) (see e.g. Chui, 1992). Filter coecients corresponding to quadratic B-Splines are<br />
shown in table 1. We can remark the following properties that makes them very suitable<br />
for the <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> ERP (Unser et al., 1992, 1993 Unser, 1997 Chui, 1992 Strang <strong>and</strong><br />
Nguyen, 1996):<br />
1. Smoothness: the smooth behavior <strong>of</strong> B-Splines is very important in order to avoid<br />
border eects when making the correlation between the original signal <strong>and</strong> a<br />
wavelet function with abrupt patterns.<br />
40