27.11.2014 Views

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

Quantitative analysis of EEG signals: Time-frequency methods and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

j (n) = X k<br />

C j (k) jk (n) (35)<br />

is the detail signal at scale j.<br />

Figure 14 shows as an example the multiresolution decomposition method applied<br />

to an event-related potential <strong>and</strong> the corresponding reconstruction achieved by using<br />

the inverse transform. The method starts by correlating the signal with shifted versions<br />

(i.e. thus giving the time evolution) <strong>of</strong> a contracted wavelet function, the coecients<br />

obtained thus giving the detail <strong>of</strong> the high <strong>frequency</strong> components. The remaining part<br />

will be a coarser version <strong>of</strong> the original signal that can be obtained by correlating the<br />

signal with the scaling function, which is orthogonal to the wavelet function. Then, the<br />

wavelet function is dilated <strong>and</strong> from the coarser signal the procedure is repeated, thus<br />

giving a decomposition <strong>of</strong> the signal in dierent scale levels, or what it is analog, in<br />

dierent <strong>frequency</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s. This method gives a decomposition <strong>of</strong> the signal that can be<br />

implemented with very ecient algorithms due to the fact that it can be achieved just<br />

by applying simple lters, as showed by Mallat (1989, see table 1 for an example). The<br />

lower levels give the details corresponding to the high <strong>frequency</strong> components <strong>and</strong> the<br />

higher levels the ones corresponding the the low frequencies. As pointed out in sec. x4.1,<br />

the levels related with higher frequencies have more coecients that the lower ones, due<br />

to the varying window size <strong>of</strong> the Wavelet Transform.<br />

4.2.4 B-Splines wavelets<br />

An important point to be discussed is howtochoose the mother functions to be compared<br />

with the signal. In principle, the wavelet function should have a certain shape that we<br />

would like to localize in the original signal. However, due to mathematical restrictions,<br />

not every function can be used as a wavelet. Then, one criterion for choosing the wavelet<br />

function is that \it looks similar" to the patterns <strong>of</strong> the original signal. In this respect,<br />

B-Spline functions seem suitable for decomposing ERPs (see bottom part <strong>of</strong> gure 13).<br />

B-Splines are piecewise polynomial functions <strong>of</strong> a certain degree that form a base in<br />

L 2 (R) (see e.g. Chui, 1992). Filter coecients corresponding to quadratic B-Splines are<br />

shown in table 1. We can remark the following properties that makes them very suitable<br />

for the <strong>analysis</strong> <strong>of</strong> ERP (Unser et al., 1992, 1993 Unser, 1997 Chui, 1992 Strang <strong>and</strong><br />

Nguyen, 1996):<br />

1. Smoothness: the smooth behavior <strong>of</strong> B-Splines is very important in order to avoid<br />

border eects when making the correlation between the original signal <strong>and</strong> a<br />

wavelet function with abrupt patterns.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!