28.11.2014 Views

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

It then outlines a set of criteria, evaluation processes, and data sources to identify landscapes with<br />

suitable biophysical conditions for investment in landscape restoration.<br />

Farming and Land Use Systems<br />

Geographic variation across Africa and diverse historical patterns of production and trade have<br />

led to a rich variety of land use and farming systems. Systems based on commercial tree crops<br />

are found in the lowlands of western Africa (including with rice) and the highlands of eastern<br />

Africa; pastoral and agropastoral systems in the drylands; and forest-based systems in central Africa.<br />

Systems based on grains and root crops dominate elsewhere. The area of Africa covered by farming<br />

systems predominantly based on trees and other perennials is relatively significant: 11 percent is<br />

covered by forest-based systems, in which producers rely on forestry/tree products interspersed<br />

with annual crop production. Another 3 percent is in tree crop systems (e.g., cocoa and oil palm); 1<br />

percent is in mixed rice-tree systems; and another 1 percent is in highland perennials (e.g., coffee<br />

and tea) (Dixon and Gullivar 2001). In each type of farming system, landscape degradation takes a<br />

somewhat different form, as do priorities and mechanisms for restoration.<br />

Scale and Consequences of Land and Forest Degradation<br />

Although it is now somewhat out of date, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s<br />

(FAO’s) 2000 Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) provided one of the most<br />

comprehensive assessments of global land degradation. Overall, 4.2 percent of Africa has strongly<br />

or extremely degraded soils—the highest percentage of any continent and twice the world average<br />

of 2.1 percent. Pockets of strong or extreme soil degradation are clustered so that certain landscapes<br />

have a high degree of degradation across a high percentage of mapping units. These severely and<br />

very severely degraded landscapes comprise about 6 million km 2 of Sub-Saharan Africa (about onefourth<br />

of the region’s land), of which 2 million km 2 have been degraded as the result of agricultural<br />

activities. These areas are concentrated at the southern margin of the Sahara Desert (stretching from<br />

the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea), South Africa, Madagascar, around Lake Victoria, and in pockets<br />

in coastal West Africa. The primary causes of degradation are deforestation, overgrazing (particularly<br />

in dryland regions), and overexploitation of vegetation for domestic use, including biomass energy.<br />

In Sub-Saharan Africa, land degradation is closely correlated with population density (FAO 2000).<br />

A recent geospatial analysis of tree cover in productive areas (Zomer et al. 2009) compares current<br />

levels of tree cover with potential tree cover, defined on the basis of geographic region, climate, and<br />

population density. This analysis suggests that several regions in Africa are below their potential in<br />

terms of tree cover (and corresponding livelihood benefits and ecosystem services) and could be<br />

priority regions for investment in restoration. These areas are in the West African coastal lowlands,<br />

pockets in northern and southern Nigeria, the eastern coast of Madagascar, north central Ethiopia,<br />

a band south of the Sahara, the area from central Tanzania to the Kenya/Uganda border and into<br />

southern Sudan, and the northern part of South Africa. Of course, these generalized patterns are<br />

mediated at the landscape level by biophysical, socioeconomic, market, and policy factors.<br />

Recently, Vlek and colleagues (2011) used a time series of satellite imagery (1982–2003) to assess<br />

changes in net primary productivity (NPP) in Africa. NPP integrates multiple causal factors (e.g., soil<br />

fertility, water availability, degradation from human activity) and has multiple implications for human<br />

well-being (e.g., availability of biomass as crops, livestock fodder, or forest resources, as well as levels<br />

of ecosystem functions such as water purification and carbon sequestration). Although the changes<br />

50 <strong><strong>IN</strong>VEST<strong>IN</strong>G</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>TREES</strong> <strong>AND</strong> L<strong>AND</strong>SCAPE RESTORATION <strong>IN</strong> AFRICA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!