28.11.2014 Views

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

INVESTING IN TREES AND LANDSCAPE ... - PROFOR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For investors, tenure is generally understood as a legal right that creates an asset that can be<br />

assigned; for instance, as an asset on the balance sheet or as collateral for a loan. The investor<br />

needs to identify how rights to land and standing timber are held by the company.<br />

Governments, in most cases, understand tenure as a strategic tool to confer the benefits of land use<br />

on different interest groups while retaining the freehold and receiving rent in return.<br />

These interests are not necessarily incompatible, but they do need clarification. There is some<br />

tension: rights claimed by communities might be ignored by the government, and local recognition<br />

of rights might not be sufficiently robust for investors. Conversely, leases granted by the government<br />

without local consent are not consistent with FPIC principles and thus do not constitute sustainable<br />

investment (and carry significant risks for the investor). All three parties need to be in a position to<br />

negotiate these rights.<br />

Securing tenure rights requires a variety of governance tactics premised on a number of legal<br />

ingredients, the sum of which provide the necessary security for a forest or landscape enterprise<br />

(RRI 2009):<br />

• Duration—sufficient to provide an incentive for communities to invest in the forest and in<br />

businesses that might sustainably use it.<br />

• Assurance—clearly prescribed, avoiding any ambiguity or distinction between subsistence and<br />

commercial use or between land and forest rights; guaranteeing returns from any investment.<br />

• Robustness—easily defensible in a court of law and so widely prescribed and disseminated<br />

that they permeate the day-to-day practice of forest officers, transport police, customs, and the<br />

judiciary.<br />

• Exclusivity—no overlap between the commercial forest rights of communities and those of<br />

external investors or government agencies.<br />

Simplicity—free of excessive bureaucratic steps, lengthy documents, costly registration procedures<br />

in distant offices, and so on.<br />

Investing in capacity building<br />

Improved capacity should be an expected outcome of investments; people generally learn by doing,<br />

and increased capacity enhances opportunities for future investment. However, some degree of<br />

capacity is required in the earlier stages to complete the basic tasks:<br />

• Organize the rights-holders into a coherent entity with professional business roles.<br />

• Secure the necessary formal commercial access rights and operating permits.<br />

• Identify the business opportunity/value proposition.<br />

• Understand the nature of the deal and any proposed relinquishment of control.<br />

• Negotiate the best outcome in response to all parties’ agendas.<br />

• Start up the business on a solid footing.<br />

86 <strong><strong>IN</strong>VEST<strong>IN</strong>G</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>TREES</strong> <strong>AND</strong> L<strong>AND</strong>SCAPE RESTORATION <strong>IN</strong> AFRICA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!