California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 3<br />
3.8.2 Initial QA/QC Procedures <strong>for</strong> Data Collectors<br />
Part of the value of CRAM is its ability to yield reproducible results <strong>for</strong> wetlands of similar<br />
condition, regardless of the data collector. Quality control procedures should be employed to<br />
assure that the data collectors or assessors are using the same approach and are obtaining<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation accurately when conducting CRAM assessments. For large wetland projects having<br />
numerous AAs and <strong>for</strong> ambient assessments involving multiple wetlands, it is recommended<br />
that at least 10% of the AAs be revisited by an independent CRAM assessment team and<br />
compared to the original assessments <strong>for</strong> the same AAs. The replicate scores should be within<br />
10% of the original scores <strong>for</strong> each attribute.<br />
Beginning in 2008, CRAM Training Courses will be offered through the Extension Service of<br />
the University of <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> at Davis (http://extension.ucdavis.edu/). Each three-day courses<br />
provides an introductory lecture, training on 2-3 wetland types, and training on eCRAM.<br />
In addition to taking on or more CRAM training courses through UC Davis Extension, all<br />
CRAM practitioners are advised to carefully read and understand the most recent version of the<br />
CRAM User’s Manual be<strong>for</strong>e they begin conducting assessments. The User’s Manual and CRAM<br />
training materials are available at the CRAM web site (www.cramwetlands.org). Supporting<br />
materials include a photo-glossary with picture examples of many of the terms and wetland<br />
characteristics described or referenced in the User’s Manual. These materials are intended to<br />
help users develop an understanding of the complete range of conditions <strong>for</strong> each metric, and<br />
arrive at consistent conclusions about wetland condition.<br />
The initial quality control procedures <strong>for</strong> any assessment involve a basic review of the AA map<br />
and the summary scoring sheet. The recommended topics <strong>for</strong> the initial quality control are listed<br />
in Table 3.12 below.<br />
Table 3.12: Recommended topics of initial QA/QC.<br />
Recommended Topics of Initial QA/QC <strong>for</strong> CRAM Results<br />
• AA map quality: hardcopy maps must be clear enough to be readily digitized.<br />
AA maps must be on geo-rectified imagery with minimum pixel resolution of<br />
3 m (i.e., each pixel should represent no more than 9 m 2 ).<br />
• Summary data sheet: make sure all fields of in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> site name, wetland<br />
type, date of assessment, personnel making the assessment, etc. are complete<br />
and legible.<br />
• Summary score sheet: make sure that every metric and attribute has a correct<br />
score, and that the overall site score is also correct.<br />
• Summary stressor sheet: make sure the stressor checklist has been completed.<br />
3.8.3 Initial Quality Control Procedures <strong>for</strong> Data Managers<br />
The main objective of data management is to assure that the data are accurately collected and<br />
verified <strong>for</strong> analysis and interpretation by CRAM practitioners and resource managers.<br />
Procedures described in this User’s Manual are designed to help assure the accuracy and<br />
40