25.12.2014 Views

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4<br />

Non-native species owe their occurrence in <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> to the actions of people ever since shortly<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e Euro American contact. “Invasive” species are non-native species that tend to dominate<br />

one or more plant layers within an AA. CRAM uses the <strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> Invasive Plant Council (Cal-<br />

IPC) list to determine the invasive status of plants, with augmentation by regional experts.<br />

B. Rationale: The functions of whole-wetland systems are optimized when a rich native flora<br />

dominates the plant community, and when the botanical structure of the wetland is complex in<br />

3-dimensional space, due to species diversity and recruitment, and resulting in suitable habitat<br />

<strong>for</strong> multiple animal species. Much of the natural microbial, invertebrate, and vertebrate<br />

communities of wetlands are adjusted to the architectural <strong>for</strong>ms, phenologies, detrital materials,<br />

and chemistry of the native vegetation. Furthermore, the physical <strong>for</strong>m of wetlands is partly the<br />

result of interactions between plants and physical processes, especially hydrology. A sudden<br />

change in the dominant species, such as results from plant invasions, can have cascading effects<br />

on whole-system <strong>for</strong>m, structure, and function.<br />

C. Seasonality: This suite of metrics is ideally assessed during the latter third of the growing<br />

season, when all plant layers have developed to their full extent.<br />

D. Field Indicators: The Plant Community Metric is assessed in terms of the similarity between<br />

the dominant species composition of the plant community and what is expected based on<br />

CRAM verification and validation studies, regional botanical surveys, and historical resources.<br />

This metric requires the ability to recognize the most common and abundant plants species of<br />

wetlands. When a CRAM field team lacks the necessary botanical expertise, voucher specimens<br />

will need to be collected using standard plant presses and site documentation. This can greatly<br />

increase the time required to complete a CRAM assessment.<br />

4.4.1.1 Number of Plant Layers Present<br />

The first submetric of the Plant Community Metric is the Number of Plant Layers Present in the<br />

AA. This submetric does not pertain to Vernal Pools or Playas. Plant layers play a large role in<br />

the assessment of the biotic structure attribute. They are distinguished from one another by the<br />

differences in average maximum heights of their co-dominant plant species. For the Other<br />

Depressional <strong>Wetlands</strong>, plus Estuarine, Lacustrine, and Non-confined Riverine <strong>Wetlands</strong> a<br />

maximum of five plant layers are recognized by CRAM. For Slope <strong>Wetlands</strong> and Confined<br />

Riverine <strong>Wetlands</strong>, a maximum of four layers are recognized. To be counted in CRAM, a layer<br />

must cover at least 5% of the portion of the AA that is suitable <strong>for</strong> the layer (see Appendix II). This<br />

would be the littoral zone of lakes and depressional wetlands <strong>for</strong> the one aquatic layer, called<br />

“floating.” The “short,” “medium,” and “tall” layers might be found throughout the non-aquatic<br />

areas of each wetland class, except in areas of exposed bedrock, mudflat, beaches, active point<br />

bars, etc. The “very tall” layer is usually expected to occur along the backshore, except in<br />

<strong>for</strong>ested wetlands.<br />

It is essential that the layers be identified by the actual plant heights (i.e., the approximate<br />

maximum heights) of plant species in the AA, regardless of the growth potential of the species.<br />

For example, in a riverine system a young sapling redwood between 0.5 m and 0.75 m tall would<br />

belong to the “medium” layer, even though in the future the same individual redwood might<br />

belong to the “very tall” layer. Some species might belong to multiple plant layers. For example,<br />

groves of red alders of all different ages and heights might collectively represent all four non-<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!