25.12.2014 Views

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4<br />

Rating<br />

A<br />

Table 4.18b: Rating of Topographic Complexity <strong>for</strong> all Estuarine <strong>Wetlands</strong>.<br />

Alternative <strong>State</strong>s<br />

(based on diagrams in Figure 4.6 above)<br />

The vegetated plain of the AA in cross-section has a variety of microtopographic<br />

features created by plants, animal tracks, cracks, partially buried<br />

debris, retrogressing channels (i.e., channels filling-in with sediment and plants),<br />

natural levees along channels, potholes and pannes that together comprise a<br />

complex array of ups and downs resembling diagram A in Figure 4.6b.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

The vegetated plain of the AA has a variety of micro-topographic features as<br />

described above <strong>for</strong> “A” but they are less abundant and/or they comprise less<br />

variability in elevation overall, as illustrated in diagram B of Figure 4.6b.<br />

The vegetated plain of the AA has a variety of micro-topographic features as<br />

described above <strong>for</strong> “A” but lacks well-<strong>for</strong>med tidal channels that are welldrained<br />

during ebb tide. If channels exist, they mostly do not drain well or are<br />

filling-in with sediment. The plain overall resembles diagram C of Figure 4.6b.<br />

The vegetated plain of the AA has little or no micro-topographic relief and few<br />

or no well-<strong>for</strong>med channels. The plain resembles diagram D of Figure 4.6b.<br />

Table 4.18c: Rating of Topographic Complexity <strong>for</strong> all Riverine <strong>Wetlands</strong>.<br />

Alternative <strong>State</strong>s<br />

Rating<br />

(based on diagrams in Figure 4.6 above)<br />

A<br />

AA as viewed along a typical cross-section has at least two benches or breaks in<br />

slope, including the riparian area of the AA, above the channel bottom, not<br />

including the thalweg. Each of these benches, plus the slopes between the<br />

benches, as well as the channel bottom area contain physical patch types or<br />

features such as boulders or cobbles, animal burrows, partially buried debris,<br />

slump blocks, furrows or runnels that contribute to abundant micro-topographic<br />

relief as illustrated in profile A of Figure 4.6c.<br />

B<br />

C<br />

D<br />

AA has at least two benches or breaks in slope above the channel bottom area of<br />

the AA, but these benches and slopes mostly lack abundant micro-topographic<br />

complexity. The AA resembles profile B of Figure 4.6c.<br />

AA has a single bench or obvious break in slope that may or may not have<br />

abundant micro-topographic complexity, as illustrated in profile C of Figure 4.6c.<br />

AA as viewed along a typical cross-section lacks any obvious break in slope or<br />

bench. The cross-section is best characterized as a single, uni<strong>for</strong>m slope with or<br />

without micro-topographic complexity, as illustrated in profile D of Figure 4.6c<br />

(includes concrete channels).<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!