California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands - State Water ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Cali<strong>for</strong>nia</strong> <strong>Rapid</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Method</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wetlands</strong> v. 5.0.2 – Chapter 4<br />
B. Rationale: <strong>Wetlands</strong> are often important components of local mosaics of multiple types of<br />
habitat. The components of such mosaics tend to be inter-connected by the flow of water and<br />
movements of wildlife, such that they have additive influences on the timing and extent of many<br />
landscape-level processes, including flooding, filtration of pesticides and other contaminants,<br />
and wildlife support. In turn, these processes can strongly influence the <strong>for</strong>m and function of<br />
wetlands. The functional capacity of a wetland is there<strong>for</strong>e determined not only by its intrinsic<br />
properties, but by its relationship to other habitats across the landscape. For example, Frissell et<br />
al. (1986) concluded that the structure and dynamics of stream habitats are determined by the<br />
surrounding watershed. Several researchers have concluded that landscape-scale variables are<br />
often better predictors of stream and wetland integrity than localized variables (Roth et al. 1996;<br />
Scott et al. 2002). <strong>Wetlands</strong> that are close together without hydrological or ecological barriers<br />
between them are better able to provide refuge and alternative habitat patches <strong>for</strong> metapopulations<br />
of wildlife, to support transient or migratory wildlife species, and to function as<br />
sources of colonists <strong>for</strong> primary or secondary succession of newly created or restored wetlands.<br />
In general, good landscape connectivity exists only where neighboring wetlands or other habitats<br />
do not have intervening obstructions that could inhibit the movements of wildlife.<br />
C. Seasonality: This metric is not sensitive to seasonality.<br />
D. Office and Field Indicators: For the purposes of CRAM, 500 m has been surmised as the<br />
maximum distance between wetlands and other water-dependent habitats that does not by itself<br />
function as a barrier to the easy regular movements of small mammals, birds, amphibians, or<br />
reptiles. Greater distances between the wetland of interest and neighboring habitats are<br />
considered breaks in landscape connectivity. Similarly, any permanent physical alteration of the<br />
landscape surrounding the wetland that would preclude the movements of wildlife between<br />
habitat types or patches, or that would substantially impound or divert surface water flow<br />
between the wetland of interest and other water-dependent habitats are also considered to be<br />
breaks in connectivity.<br />
All wetlands except riverine: On digital or hardcopy site imagery, draw a<br />
straight line extending 500 m from the AA boundary in each of the four<br />
cardinal compass directions. The lines should intercept the approximate<br />
centroid of the AA. Along each transect line, estimate the percentage of the<br />
segment that passes through wetland or aquatic habitat of any kind, including<br />
open water. Vernal pool systems should be considered aquatic habitat. Use the<br />
worksheet below to record these estimates.<br />
Worksheet 4.1: Landscape Connectivity Metric <strong>for</strong> All <strong>Wetlands</strong> Except Riverine<br />
Percentage of Transect Lines that Contains<br />
Wetland Habitat of Any Kind<br />
Segment Direction<br />
North<br />
South<br />
East<br />
West<br />
Average Percentage of Transect Length<br />
That Is Wetland<br />
Percentage of Transect Length<br />
That is Wetland<br />
44