Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Key Issue Identification<br />
Whether council wishes to continue taxing computer s<strong>of</strong>tware and access to online<br />
databases.<br />
STAFF RECOMMENDATION<br />
Suggested Motion Language:<br />
Staff requests council consideration <strong>of</strong> this matter and action in the form <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following motion: Motion to introduce, complete first reading, and order<br />
published by title only an ordinance amending Title 3, “Revenue And Taxation,”<br />
B.R.C. 1981, to clarify the definition <strong>of</strong> “Taxable Services” with respect to<br />
downloaded s<strong>of</strong>tware and on-line data bases.<br />
COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND IMPACTS<br />
• Economic – Passing this ordinance would not result in any new revenue to the<br />
city, but would avoid the loss <strong>of</strong> at least $ 2.9 million.<br />
• Environmental – Passing this ordinance could have a minimal adverse<br />
environmental effect if by taxing only s<strong>of</strong>tware acquired on disk, purchasers were<br />
encouraged to buy s<strong>of</strong>tware over the internet and avoid the use <strong>of</strong> disposable<br />
packaging. Staff believes that most buyers have or will switch to downloaded<br />
s<strong>of</strong>tware for reasons independent <strong>of</strong> the tax.<br />
• Social – None.<br />
OTHER IMPACTS<br />
• Fiscal – Failure to pass the amendment would result in the loss <strong>of</strong> tax revenue.<br />
• Staff time – No additional staff time would be necessary to implement the<br />
amended ordinance if passed.<br />
BOARD AND COMMISSION FEEDBACK<br />
Not Applicable.<br />
PUBLIC FEEDBACK<br />
None.<br />
BACKGROUND<br />
In 2009, the city audited Ball Aerospace for the period between January 1, 2006 and<br />
January 1, 2009. The city issued an assessment for $426,067.19, which was later<br />
reduced to $422,790.59 after review <strong>of</strong> protests from Ball Aerospace. Ball Aerospace<br />
appealed the revised assessment to the state district court. The primary ground for appeal<br />
was Ball’s claim that the city’s sales and use tax ordinance should apply only to s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />
that is purchased in a physical form and not to s<strong>of</strong>tware downloaded from the internet.<br />
K:\FIAD\First Read Agenda memo S<strong>of</strong>tware Ord.-.doc<br />
Agenda Item 3M Page 2