08.11.2012 Views

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

Suzy Ageton George Karakehian KC Becker Tim ... - City of Boulder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Key Issue Identification<br />

Whether council wishes to continue taxing computer s<strong>of</strong>tware and access to online<br />

databases.<br />

STAFF RECOMMENDATION<br />

Suggested Motion Language:<br />

Staff requests council consideration <strong>of</strong> this matter and action in the form <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following motion: Motion to introduce, complete first reading, and order<br />

published by title only an ordinance amending Title 3, “Revenue And Taxation,”<br />

B.R.C. 1981, to clarify the definition <strong>of</strong> “Taxable Services” with respect to<br />

downloaded s<strong>of</strong>tware and on-line data bases.<br />

COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND IMPACTS<br />

• Economic – Passing this ordinance would not result in any new revenue to the<br />

city, but would avoid the loss <strong>of</strong> at least $ 2.9 million.<br />

• Environmental – Passing this ordinance could have a minimal adverse<br />

environmental effect if by taxing only s<strong>of</strong>tware acquired on disk, purchasers were<br />

encouraged to buy s<strong>of</strong>tware over the internet and avoid the use <strong>of</strong> disposable<br />

packaging. Staff believes that most buyers have or will switch to downloaded<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware for reasons independent <strong>of</strong> the tax.<br />

• Social – None.<br />

OTHER IMPACTS<br />

• Fiscal – Failure to pass the amendment would result in the loss <strong>of</strong> tax revenue.<br />

• Staff time – No additional staff time would be necessary to implement the<br />

amended ordinance if passed.<br />

BOARD AND COMMISSION FEEDBACK<br />

Not Applicable.<br />

PUBLIC FEEDBACK<br />

None.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

In 2009, the city audited Ball Aerospace for the period between January 1, 2006 and<br />

January 1, 2009. The city issued an assessment for $426,067.19, which was later<br />

reduced to $422,790.59 after review <strong>of</strong> protests from Ball Aerospace. Ball Aerospace<br />

appealed the revised assessment to the state district court. The primary ground for appeal<br />

was Ball’s claim that the city’s sales and use tax ordinance should apply only to s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

that is purchased in a physical form and not to s<strong>of</strong>tware downloaded from the internet.<br />

K:\FIAD\First Read Agenda memo S<strong>of</strong>tware Ord.-.doc<br />

Agenda Item 3M Page 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!